Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire
- PMID: 26898339
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2016.01.006
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire
Abstract
Background: Low back pain is among the most common musculoskeletal system disorders. Outcome measures are needed for the measurement of function, to establish a treatment program, and for monitoring the improvement in low back pain. There exist several questionnaires enquiring about function in low back pain. One of these is Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire, whose reliability and validity were previously established. Other than the original version of the questionnaire, only its Persian version exists. The present study aims to investigate the cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire.
Methods: The study included 103 patients with low back pain. For reliability assessment of the questionnaire, test-retest and internal consistency analyses were performed. The results of test-retest analysis were assessed by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient method. For internal consistency, Cronbach Alpha value was used. Validity analyses of the questionnaire were performed by construct validity. For construct validity, convergent validity was tested. Convergent validity of the questionnaire was calculated via its correlation with suitable subscales of the Short Form-36 and the total score of the Oswestry Disability Index by using Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Results: Intraclass Correlation Coefficient values for test-retest reliability were found to be in the range of 0.765-0.924, which indicate a sufficient level of test-retest reliability. Cronbach's Alpha value was found to be 0.804 indicating a high internal consistency. Pearson's correlation coefficient between Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire to Short Form-36 and Oswestry Disability Index values were ranged between 0.424 and -0.810, indicating a good correlation.
Conclusions: Considering all these data, it was concluded that the Turkish version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire is valid and reliable.
Copyright © 2016 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Simplified Chinese Version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire: Cross-cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity for Patients With Low Back Pain.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Mar 15;43(6):E357-E364. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002424. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018. PMID: 28953707
-
Reliability, Validity, and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Turkish Version of the Bournemouth Questionnaire.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Nov 1;41(21):E1292-E1297. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001599. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016. PMID: 27046639
-
Validation of the Turkish version of the Quebec back pain disability scale for patients with low back pain.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Mar 15;34(6):E219-24. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181971e2d. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009. PMID: 19282728
-
A review of culturally adapted versions of the Oswestry Disability Index: the adaptation process, construct validity, test-retest reliability and internal consistency.Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(25):2367-74. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1019647. Epub 2015 Mar 4. Disabil Rehabil. 2015. PMID: 25738913 Review.
-
Cross-cultural adaptation of The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire: A methodological systematic review.J Orthop Sci. 2023 Sep;28(5):984-991. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2022.08.003. Epub 2022 Sep 19. J Orthop Sci. 2023. PMID: 36137918
Cited by
-
The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire.J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Jul;29(7):1250-1253. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1250. Epub 2017 Jul 15. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017. PMID: 28744058 Free PMC article.
-
A quantitative method for measuring the relationship between an objective endpoint and patient reported outcome measures.PLoS One. 2018 Oct 25;13(10):e0205845. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205845. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30359417 Free PMC article.
-
Comprehensive Assessment of Indirect Decompression Through Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire-Based Analysis.Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):656-667. doi: 10.1177/21925682231204254. Epub 2023 Sep 26. Global Spine J. 2025. PMID: 37750358 Free PMC article.
-
A comparison between the low back pain scales for patients with lumbar disc herniation: validity, reliability, and responsiveness.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jun 10;18(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01403-2. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020. PMID: 32522196 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical