Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2016 May:102:1-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Feb 16.

The value of vital sign trends for detecting clinical deterioration on the wards

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

The value of vital sign trends for detecting clinical deterioration on the wards

Matthew M Churpek et al. Resuscitation. 2016 May.

Abstract

Aim: Early detection of clinical deterioration on the wards may improve outcomes, and most early warning scores only utilize a patient's current vital signs. The added value of vital sign trends over time is poorly characterized. We investigated whether adding trends improves accuracy and which methods are optimal for modelling trends.

Methods: Patients admitted to five hospitals over a five-year period were included in this observational cohort study, with 60% of the data used for model derivation and 40% for validation. Vital signs were utilized to predict the combined outcome of cardiac arrest, intensive care unit transfer, and death. The accuracy of models utilizing both the current value and different trend methods were compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Results: A total of 269,999 patient admissions were included, which resulted in 16,452 outcomes. Overall, trends increased accuracy compared to a model containing only current vital signs (AUC 0.78 vs. 0.74; p<0.001). The methods that resulted in the greatest average increase in accuracy were the vital sign slope (AUC improvement 0.013) and minimum value (AUC improvement 0.012), while the change from the previous value resulted in an average worsening of the AUC (change in AUC -0.002). The AUC increased most for systolic blood pressure when trends were added (AUC improvement 0.05).

Conclusion: Vital sign trends increased the accuracy of models designed to detect critical illness on the wards. Our findings have important implications for clinicians at the bedside and for the development of early warning scores.

Keywords: Decision support techniques; Early diagnosis; Heart arrest; Hospital rapid response team; Physiologic monitoring; Vital signs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Respiratory rate: AUCs for the current value and the bivariable trend models
Figure 2
Figure 2
Heart rate: AUCs for the current vital sign value and the bivariable trend models
Figure 3
Figure 3
Systolic blood pressure: AUCs for the current vital sign value and the bivariable trend models
Figure 4
Figure 4
Diastolic blood pressure: AUCs for the current vital sign value and the bivariable trend models
Figure 5
Figure 5
Oxygen saturation: AUCs for the current vital sign value and the bivariable trend models
Figure 6
Figure 6
Temperature: AUCs for the current vital sign value and the bivariable trend models

References

    1. Churpek MM, Yuen TC, Winslow C, et al. Multicenter development and validation of a risk stratification tool for ward patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190:649–655. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Churpek MM, Yuen TC, Edelson DP. Risk stratification of hospitalized patients on the wards. Chest. 2013;143:1758–1765. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith GB, Prytherch DR, Schmidt PE, Featherstone PI. Review and performance evaluation of aggregate weighted 'track and trigger' systems. Resuscitation. 2008;77:170–179. - PubMed
    1. Smith GB, Prytherch DR, Schmidt PE, Featherstone PI, Higgins B. A review, and performance evaluation, of single-parameter "track and trigger" systems. Resuscitation. 2008;79:11–21. - PubMed
    1. Semler MW, Stover DG, Copland AP, et al. Flash mob research: A single-day, multicenter, resident-directed study of respiratory rate. Chest. 2013;143:1740–1744. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types