Coercion Changes the Sense of Agency in the Human Brain
- PMID: 26898470
- PMCID: PMC4791480
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.12.067
Coercion Changes the Sense of Agency in the Human Brain
Abstract
People may deny responsibility for negative consequences of their actions by claiming that they were "only obeying orders." The "Nuremberg defense" offers one extreme example, though it is often dismissed as merely an attempt to avoid responsibility. Milgram's classic laboratory studies reported widespread obedience to an instruction to harm, suggesting that social coercion may alter mechanisms of voluntary agency, and hence abolish the normal experience of being in control of one's own actions. However, Milgram's and other studies relied on dissembling and on explicit measures of agency, which are known to be biased by social norms. Here, we combined coercive instructions to administer harm to a co-participant, with implicit measures of sense of agency, based on perceived compression of time intervals between voluntary actions and their outcomes, and with electrophysiological recordings. In two experiments, an experimenter ordered a volunteer to make a key-press action that caused either financial penalty or demonstrably painful electric shock to their co-participant, thereby increasing their own financial gain. Coercion increased the perceived interval between action and outcome, relative to a situation where participants freely chose to inflict the same harms. Interestingly, coercion also reduced the neural processing of the outcomes of one's own action. Thus, people who obey orders may subjectively experience their actions as closer to passive movements than fully voluntary actions. Our results highlight the complex relation between the brain mechanisms that generate the subjective experience of voluntary actions and social constructs, such as responsibility.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Figures






Similar articles
-
The obedient mind and the volitional brain: A neural basis for preserved sense of agency and sense of responsibility under coercion.PLoS One. 2021 Oct 28;16(10):e0258884. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258884. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34710149 Free PMC article.
-
Only giving orders? An experimental study of the sense of agency when giving or receiving commands.PLoS One. 2018 Sep 26;13(9):e0204027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204027. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30256827 Free PMC article.
-
Obedience induces agentic shifts by increasing the perceived time between own action and results.Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 22;14(1):16769. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66499-8. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39039144 Free PMC article.
-
Sense of agency in the human brain.Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 Apr;18(4):196-207. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2017.14. Epub 2017 Mar 2. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017. PMID: 28251993 Review.
-
The implicit sense of agency is not a perceptual effect but is a judgment effect.Cogn Process. 2022 Feb;23(1):1-13. doi: 10.1007/s10339-021-01066-x. Epub 2021 Nov 9. Cogn Process. 2022. PMID: 34751857 Review.
Cited by
-
The limits of refusal: An ethical review of solid organ transplantation and vaccine hesitancy.Am J Transplant. 2021 Aug;21(8):2637-2645. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16472. Epub 2021 Jan 23. Am J Transplant. 2021. PMID: 33370501 Free PMC article.
-
The anti-anxiety drug lorazepam changes implicit behaviors but not explicit evaluations of sense of agency under authoritative pressure: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study.Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 21;13:991357. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.991357. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 36478922 Free PMC article.
-
A comparison of the effects of occupation-based interventions with and without responsibility feedback and conventional interventions on participation in people with idiopathic Parkinson's disease: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2023 Sep 26;24(1):610. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07526-3. Trials. 2023. PMID: 37749629 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring the Sense of Agency: A French Adaptation and Validation of the Sense of Agency Scale (F-SoAS).Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 8;11:584145. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584145. eCollection 2020. Front Psychol. 2020. PMID: 33132992 Free PMC article.
-
Freedom to act enhances the sense of agency, while movement and goal-related prediction errors reduce it.Psychol Res. 2021 Apr;85(3):987-1004. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01319-y. Epub 2020 Mar 31. Psychol Res. 2021. PMID: 32236696
References
-
- Milgram S. Behavioral study of obedience. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 1963;67:371–378. - PubMed
-
- Milgram S. Harper and Row; 1974. Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View.
-
- Wegner D.M. The MIT press; 2002. The Illusion of Conscious Will.
-
- Bandura A. Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2006;1:164–180. - PubMed
-
- Haggard P., Clark S., Kalogeras J. Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nat. Neurosci. 2002;5:382–385. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources