Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016;38(5):534-50.
doi: 10.1080/13803395.2015.1136598. Epub 2016 Feb 22.

Comparing individual differences in inconsistency and plasticity as predictors of cognitive function in older adults

Jacob H G Grand  1   2 , Robert S Stawski  3 , Stuart W S MacDonald  1   2
Affiliations

Comparing individual differences in inconsistency and plasticity as predictors of cognitive function in older adults

Jacob H G Grand et al. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2016.

Abstract

Introduction: Recent theorizing differentiates key constraints on cognition, including one's current range of processing efficiency (i.e., flexibility or inconsistency) as well as the capacity to expand flexibility over time (i.e., plasticity). The present study uses intensive assessment of response time data to examine the interplay between markers of intraindividual variability (inconsistency) and gains across biweekly retest sessions (plasticity) in relation to age-related cognitive function.

Method: Participants included 304 adults (aged 64 to 92 years: M = 74.02, SD = 5.95) from Project MIND, a longitudinal burst design study assessing performance across micro and macro intervals (response latency trials, weekly bursts, annual retests). For two reaction time (RT) measures (choice RT and one-back choice RT), baseline measures of RT inconsistency (intraindividual standard deviation, ISD, across trials at the first testing session) and plasticity (within-person performance gains in average RT across the 5 biweekly burst sessions) were computed and were then employed in linear mixed models as predictors of individual differences in cognitive function and longitudinal (6-year) rates of cognitive change.

Results: Independent of chronological age and years of education, higher RT inconsistency was associated uniformly with poorer cognitive function at baseline and with increased cognitive decline for measures of episodic memory and crystallized verbal ability. In contrast, predictive associations for plasticity were more modest for baseline cognitive function and were absent for 6-year cognitive change.

Conclusions: These findings underscore the potential utility of response times for articulating inconsistency and plasticity as dynamic predictors of cognitive function in older adults.

Keywords: Inconsistency; aging; cognition; cross-sectional; flexibility; linear mixed models; longitudinal; plasticity; variability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Allaire JC, Marsiske M. Intraindividual variability may not always indicate vulnerability in elders’ cognitive performance. Psychology and Aging. 2005;20:390–401. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anstey KJ, Dear K, Christensen H, Jorm AF. Biomarkers, health, lifestyle, and demographic variables as correlates of reaction time performance in early, middle, and late adulthood. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2005;58A:5–21. - PubMed
    1. Bäckman L, Dixon RA. Psychological compensation: A theoretical framework. Psychological Bulletin. 1992;112:259–283. - PubMed
    1. Bäckman L, Small BJ, Wahlin A, Larsson M. Cognitive functioning in very old age. In: Craik FIM, Salthouse TA, editors. Handbook of aging and cognition. 2. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000. pp. 499–558.
    1. Baldwin JM. Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology. New York: The Macmillan Company; 1901.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources