Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Nov;30(11):4841-4852.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4818-9. Epub 2016 Feb 22.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer: T1 and beyond? An evidence-based review

Affiliations
Review

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer: T1 and beyond? An evidence-based review

Marco E Allaix et al. Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Background: The last three decades have witnessed significant improvements in the diagnosis, staging and treatment of rectal cancer leading to a more tailored approach. One of the most clinically relevant advances in this field is represented by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Several studies have investigated its role in the treatment of rectal cancer. However, evidence-based recommendations are limited. The aim of this report is to provide an evidence-based review of current indications, controversies and future perspectives of TEM in the management of rectal cancer.

Methods: A review of the literature has been performed in PubMed/Medline electronic databases and the Cochrane Library. Quality of evidence was evaluated according to the GRADE system.

Results: TEM allows to perform a more accurate en bloc full-thickness local excision of rectal tumors than transanal excision. TEM alone seems to provide similar oncologic results in selected T1sm1 N0 rectal cancers to those achieved by rectal resection and total mesorectal excision (TME), without impairing anorectal function. The oncologic outcomes of neoadjuvant therapy followed by TEM for selected T2 N0 rectal cancers are promising, but this approach is still under evaluation. A word of caution comes from the increased rate of suture dehiscence and rectal pain after TEM. TEM is a promising tool for the surgical treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer as a platform for transanal TME.

Conclusions: Selected T1 rectal cancers with favorable features may be effectively treated with TEM without jeopardizing long-term oncologic outcomes. The lack of adequate lymphadenectomy represents the main concern of this approach for the treatment of rectal cancer. Several approaches are under evaluation to overcome this limitation.

Keywords: Chemoradiation therapy; Evidence based; Full-thickness excision; Lymph nodes; Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery; Rectal cancer; Total mesorectal excision; Transanal endoscopic microsurgery; Transanal endoscopic operation; Transanal minimally invasive surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. JAMA Surg. 2013 Mar;148(3):226-30; discussion 231 - PubMed
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Mar;48(3):429-37 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2014 Jan;28(1):227-34 - PubMed
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Jan;59(1):8-15 - PubMed
    1. Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Feb;19(2):69-82 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources