Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2016 Aug;18(8):1146-56.
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/now009. Epub 2016 Feb 21.

A Phase II randomized study of galunisertib monotherapy or galunisertib plus lomustine compared with lomustine monotherapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A Phase II randomized study of galunisertib monotherapy or galunisertib plus lomustine compared with lomustine monotherapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma

Alba A Brandes et al. Neuro Oncol. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

Background: The combination of galunisertib, a transforming growth factor (TGF)-β receptor (R)1 kinase inhibitor, and lomustine was found to have antitumor activity in murine models of glioblastoma.

Methods: Galunisertib (300 mg/day) was given orally 14 days on/14 days off (intermittent dosing). Lomustine was given as approved. Patients were randomized in a 2:1:1 ratio to galunisertib + lomustine, galunisertib monotherapy, or placebo + lomustine. The primary objective was overall survival (OS); secondary objectives were safety, pharmacokinetics (PKs), and antitumor activity.

Results: One hundred fifty-eight patients were randomized: galunisertib + lomustine (N = 79), galunisertib (N = 39), and placebo + lomustine (N = 40). Baseline characteristics were: male (64.6%), white (75.3%), median age 58 years, ECOG performance status (PS) 1 (63.3%), and primary glioblastoma (93.7%). The PKs of galunisertib were not altered with lomustine, and galunisertib had a median half-life of ∼8 hours. Median OS in months (95% credible interval [CrI]) for galunisertib + lomustine was 6.7 (range: 5.3-8.5), 8.0 (range: 5.7-11.7) for galunisertib alone, and 7.5 (range: 5.6-10.3) for placebo + lomustine. There was no difference in OS for patients treated with galunisertib + lomustine compared with placebo + lomustine [P (HR < 1) = 26%]. Median progression-free survival of ∼2 months was observed in all 3 arms. Among 8 patients with IDH1 mutation, 7 patients were treated with galunisertib (monotherapy or with lomustine); OS ranged from 4 to 17 months. Patients treated with galunisertib alone had fewer drug-related grade 3/4 adverse events (n = 34) compared with lomustine-treated patients (10% vs 26%). Baseline PS, post-discontinuation of bevacizumab, tumor size, and baseline levels of MDC/CCL22 were correlated with OS.

Conclusions: Galunisertib + lomustine failed to demonstrate improved OS relative to placebo + lomustine. Efficacy outcomes were similar in all 3 arms.

Clinical trial registration: NCT01582269, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Keywords: Bayesian design; Phase II randomized study; antitumor activity; galunisertib monohydrate (LY2157299); pharmacokinetics; safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Patient disposition: 180 patients were entered into the study, and 158 were randomized to 3 arms in a 2:1:1 ratio.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Efficacy endpoints: (A) Kaplan-Meier curve for overall survival; (B) Kaplan-Meier curve for progression-free survival (based on investigator review). Patients at risk denote the number of patients who were event-free at the beginning of the period.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival by baseline prognostic factors. (A) ECOG PS; (B) tumor burden; (C) bevacizumab; (D) MDC levels. “Patients at risk” denote the number of patients who were event-free at the beginning of the period. Continuous factors (baseline tumor burden and baseline MDC levels) were split into 2 groups at the median. The median baseline tumor burden was 821 mm2, and the median baseline MDC was 232 pg/mL.

References

    1. Stupp R, Pavlidis N, Jelic S, ESMO Guidelines Task Force. ESMO minimum clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of malignant glioma. Ann Oncol. 2005;16(Suppl 1):i64–i65. - PubMed
    1. Agnihotri S, Burrell KE, Wolf A et al. Glioblastoma, a brief review of history, molecular genetics, animal models and novel therapeutic strategies. Arch Immunol Ther Exp. 2013;61(1):25–41. - PubMed
    1. Golestaneh N, Mishra B. TGF-b, neuronal stem cells and glioblastoma. Oncogene. 2005;24(37):5722–5730. - PubMed
    1. Schneider T, Sailer M, Ansorge S, Firsching R, Reinhold D. Increased concentrations of transforming growth factor beta1 and beta2 in the plasma of patients with glioblastoma. J Neurooncol. 2006;79(1):61–65. - PubMed
    1. Bruna A, Darken RS, Rojo F et al. High TGFbeta-Smad activity confers poor prognosis in glioma patients and promotes cell proliferation depending on the methylation of the PDGF-B gene. Cancer Cell. 2007;11(2):147–160. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data