Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov:92:141-147.
doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.02.026. Epub 2016 Feb 21.

Some context for understanding the place of the general educational development degree in the relationship between educational attainment and smoking prevalence

Affiliations

Some context for understanding the place of the general educational development degree in the relationship between educational attainment and smoking prevalence

Allison N Kurti et al. Prev Med. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Introduction: Individuals with a General Educational Development (GED) degree have the highest smoking prevalence of any education level, including high school dropouts without a GED. Yet little research has been reported providing a context for understanding the exception that the GED represents in the otherwise graded inverse relationship between educational attainment and smoking prevalence. We investigated whether the GED may be associated with a general riskier profile that includes but is not limited to increased smoking prevalence.

Method: Data were obtained from three years (2011-2013) of the National Survey on Drug Use and Health ([NSDUH], N=55,940]). Prevalence of risky repertoire indicators (e.g., ever arrested, seldom/never wears a seatbelt), indicators of social instability (e.g., frequent relocations), and risky demographic characteristics (e.g., male gender) were compared among high school dropouts, GED holders, and high school graduates using Rao-Scott chi square goodness-of-fit tests and multiple logistic regression.

Results: Those with GEDs differed significantly between both high school dropouts and high school graduates across 19 of 27 (70.4%) risk indicators. Controlling for risky profile characteristics accounted for a significant but limited (25-30%) proportion of the variance in smoking prevalence across these three education levels.

Conclusion: GED holders exhibit a broad high-risk profile of which smoking is just one component. Future research evaluating additional risk indicators and mechanisms that may underpin this generalized risky repertoire are likely needed for a more complete understanding of GED's place in the important relationship between educational attainment and smoking prevalence.

Keywords: Cigarette smoking; Education; General Educational Development (GED); National Survey on Drug Use and Health; Nationally representative samples; Risky behavior; Young adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prevalence of current cigarette smoking across levels of educational attainment among U.S. adults aged 18-25 years. Bars represent weighted prevalence estimates and error represents standard error (SE) estimates—National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), 2011-2013. Where superscripts differ, Rao Scott chi-square goodness-of-fit tests indicated significant differences, p < .05.

References

    1. Agaku I, King B, Dube SR. Current cigarette smoking among adults - United States 2005-2012. 2014:29–39. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bakker H, Jaddoe VW. Cardiovascular and metabolic influences of fetal smoke exposure. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2011;26:763–70. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bickel WK, Moody L, Quisenberry AJ, Ramey CT, Sheffer CE. A Competing Neurobehavioral Decision Systems model of SES-related health and behavioral disparities. Prev. Med. 2014;68:37–43. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boesel D, Alsalam N, Smith TM. Educational and labor market performance of GED recipients. Research Synthesis. 1998 Available online at: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED416383.pdf.
    1. Cameron SV, Heckman JJ. The nonequivalence of high school equivalents. Journal of Labor Economics. 1993;11:1–47.

Publication types