Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr 1;196(7):2933-8.
doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1501144. Epub 2016 Feb 22.

Cutting Edge: Engineering Active IKKβ in T Cells Drives Tumor Rejection

Affiliations

Cutting Edge: Engineering Active IKKβ in T Cells Drives Tumor Rejection

César Evaristo et al. J Immunol. .

Abstract

Acquired dysfunction of tumor-reactive T cells is one mechanism by which tumors can evade the immune system. Identifying and correcting pathways that contribute to such dysfunction should enable novel anticancer therapy design. During cancer growth, T cells show reduced NF-κB activity, which is required for tumor rejection. Impaired T cell-intrinsic NF-κB may create a vicious cycle conducive to tumor progression and further T cell dysfunction. We hypothesized that forcing T cell-intrinsic NF-κB activation might break this cycle and induce tumor elimination. NF-κB was activated in T cells by inducing the expression of a constitutively active form of the upstream activator IκB kinase β (IKKβ). T cell-restricted constitutively active IKKβ augmented the frequency of functional tumor-specific CD8(+) T cells and improved tumor control. Transfer of constitutively active IKKβ-transduced T cells also boosted endogenous T cell responses that controlled pre-established tumors. Our results demonstrate that driving T cell-intrinsic NF-κB can result in tumor control, thus identifying a pathway with potential clinical applicability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Expression of caIKKβ in T cells improves tumor control in a CD8+ T cell-dependent manner
(A, B) CD4Cre x caIKKβ and littermate control mice were inoculated with 106 B16.SIY (n=3)(A) or B16.F10 (n=3–5)(B) cells s.c. and tumor area was assessed over time. (C-F) CD4Cre x caIKKβ mice were injected with 250µg of control IgG, anti-CD8+anti-CD4 (C, n=3), anti-CD8 (D, n=4) or anti-CD4 (E, n=3) depleting antibodies i.v. at days -7, 0, 7, 14, 21 and 28 relative to inoculation with 106 B16.SIY cells s.c., and tumor area was assessed over time. Tumor growth in littermate controls was assessed for comparison (C, n=5; E, n=1). Depletion efficacy was measured in the blood by flow cytometry (F); circles and squares are plotted against the left and right Y axes, respectively. Data are from 1 (C) or representative of 7 (A) and 2 (B, D-F) independent experiments. Results show mean ± SEM. Differences were determined by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-test for multiple comparisons, with *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Expression of caIKKβ in T cells results in increased frequency of IFN-γ-producing tumor-specific CD8+ T cells
CD4Cre x caIKKβ or littermate control mice were inoculated with 106 B16.SIY cells. (A, B) Seven days later, the frequency of H2-Kb:SIY-specific CD8+ T cells in the spleen was assessed by flow cytometry. (A) Representative plots. (B) Summarized results (n=3). (C) Number (n=6) and (D) area (n=3) of IFN-γ ELISpots assessed after culture of splenocytes with irradiated tumor cells for 24h. (E) CD4Cre x caIKKβ or littermate control mice were inoculated with 106 B16.SIY cells and injected i.p. with neutralizing anti-IFN-γ or control IgG at days 0, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20 (n=3–5). Tumor area was analyzed over time. Results show individual mice (B-D) and/or mean ± SEM (B-E) of 1 of 2 independent experiments (B, D, E) or of 2 pooled experiments (C). Differences were determined by Mann-Whitney test (B, C, D) or two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-test for multiple comparisons (E), with *p<0.05, **p<0.01.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Induction of caIKKβ expression in peripheral T cells is sufficient to enhance control of tumor growth
(A,B) LckCreER x caIKKβ and littermate control mice (Cre-negative-STOPfl/fl-caIKKβ received tamoxifen by gavage (d-7, d-6 and d-4 before inoculation of 106 B16.SIY cells s.c.). (A) Frequency of GFP+ among blood CD4+ or CD8+ T cells at the indicated times relative to the beginning of tamoxifen treatment (n=4–6). (B) Tumor area was analyzed over time (n=9–15). (C) The percentage of transduced T cells was determined in the blood prior to tumor inoculation and at sacrifice (d24) (n=10–13). Results show mean ± SEM and were pooled from 2 (A), 3 (B) and 4 (C) independent experiments. Differences were determined by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-test for multiple comparisons (B) or Mann-Whitney test (C), with *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Adoptive transfer of RV-caIKKβ-transduced T cells results in increased control of pre-established tumors
Splenocytes from WT (A-D), 2C/RAG-KO and OTI/RAG-KO (E,F) or Thy1.1 congenic (G,H) mice were transduced with RV-caIKKβGFP or RV–GFP. (A) Single live cells were gated and percent transduced T cells based on GFP expression was assessed by flow cytometry prior to transfer. (B-D) Cells from A, adjusted to contain 0.5–1x106 transduced (GFP+) T cells were adoptively transferred (↓) into WT mice inoculated with 106 B16.SIY cells 7 days earlier. Seven days after transfer, the frequency of H2-Kb:SIY-specific CD8+ T cells in the spleen and tumor was assessed by flow cytometry (n=5) (B) and the frequency of splenocytes that produced IFN-γ when stimulated with SIY peptide was analyzed by ELISpot (n=4) (C). (D) Tumor area was analyzed over time (n=5). (E,F) Cells adjusted to contain 2 × 105 transduced TCR transgenic T cells were transferred into congenic Thy1.2+ WT mice inoculated 7 days earlier with B16.SIY. (E) Tumor growth was analyzed over time (n=5/group). (F) A similar cohort of mice was sacrificed 7 days post-cell transfer (n=5/group) and the percentage of tumor-infiltrating host CD8+ T cells producing IFNγ upon SIY restimulation was determined by flow cytometry. (G,H) Cells adjusted to contain 106 transduced Thy1.1 polyclonal T cells were transferred into congenic Thy1.2+ WT mice that had been inoculated with B16.SIY cells 7 days earlier. Hosts were injected with isotype control (n=5) or anti-Thy1.1 mAb (n=5) on days 14, 16 and 18 post-tumor inoculation. (G) Depletion of Thy1.1+ cells is shown in the spleen and tumor at animal sacrifice. (H) Tumor growth was determined over time. Results show individual mice (B, C, F) and/or mean ± SEM (D, E, G, F)) and are representative of 2 independent experiments. Differences were determined by Mann-Whitney test (B, C, F, G), and by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-test for multiple comparisons (D), with *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001. ACT: adoptive cell therapy.

References

    1. Hung K, Hayashi R, Lafond-Walker A, Lowenstein C, Pardoll D, Levitsky H. The central role of CD4(+) T cells in the antitumor immune response. J Exp Med. 1998;188:2357–2368. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mlecnik B, Tosolini M, Kirilovsky A, Berger A, Bindea G, Meatchi T, Bruneval P, Trajanoski Z, Fridman WH, Pages F, Galon J. Histopathologic-based prognostic factors of colorectal cancers are associated with the state of the local immune reaction. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:610–618. - PubMed
    1. Harlin H, Meng Y, Peterson AC, Zha Y, Tretiakova M, Slingluff C, McKee M, Gajewski TF. Chemokine expression in melanoma metastases associated with CD8+ T-cell recruitment. Cancer Res. 2009;69:3077–3085. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ulloa-Montoya F, Louahed J, Dizier B, Gruselle O, Spiessens B, Lehmann FF, Suciu S, Kruit WH, Eggermont AM, Vansteenkiste J, Brichard VG. Predictive gene signature in MAGE-A3 antigen-specific cancer immunotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:2388–2395. - PubMed
    1. Zhang L, Conejo-Garcia JR, Katsaros D, Gimotty PA, Massobrio M, Regnani G, Makrigiannakis A, Gray H, Schlienger K, Liebman MN, Rubin SC, Coukos G. Intratumoral T cells, recurrence, and survival in epithelial ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:203–213. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms