SIRFLOX: Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing First-Line mFOLFOX6 (Plus or Minus Bevacizumab) Versus mFOLFOX6 (Plus or Minus Bevacizumab) Plus Selective Internal Radiation Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
- PMID: 26903575
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.66.1181
SIRFLOX: Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing First-Line mFOLFOX6 (Plus or Minus Bevacizumab) Versus mFOLFOX6 (Plus or Minus Bevacizumab) Plus Selective Internal Radiation Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Erratum in
-
ERRATA.J Clin Oncol. 2016 Nov 20;34(33):4059. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.8982. J Clin Oncol. 2016. PMID: 29236595 No abstract available.
Abstract
Purpose: SIRFLOX was a randomized, multicenter trial designed to assess the efficacy and safety of adding selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) using yttrium-90 resin microspheres to standard fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX)-based chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.
Patients and methods: Chemotherapy-naïve patients with liver metastases plus or minus limited extrahepatic metastases were randomly assigned to receive either modified FOLFOX (mFOLFOX6; control) or mFOLFOX6 plus SIRT (SIRT) plus or minus bevacizumab. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) at any site as assessed by independent centralized radiology review blinded to study arm.
Results: Between October 2006 and April 2013, 530 patients were randomly assigned to treatment (control, 263; SIRT, 267). Median PFS at any site was 10.2 v 10.7 months in control versus SIRT (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.12; P = .43). Median PFS in the liver by competing risk analysis was 12.6 v 20.5 months in control versus SIRT (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.90; P = .002). Objective response rates (ORRs) at any site were similar (68.1% v 76.4% in control v SIRT; P = .113). ORR in the liver was improved with the addition of SIRT (68.8% v 78.7% in control v SIRT; P = .042). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events, including recognized SIRT-related effects, were reported in 73.4% and 85.4% of patients in control versus SIRT.
Conclusion: The addition of SIRT to FOLFOX-based first-line chemotherapy in patients with liver-dominant or liver-only metastatic colorectal cancer did not improve PFS at any site but significantly delayed disease progression in the liver. The safety profile was as expected and was consistent with previous studies.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00724503.
© 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Comment in
-
Gastrointestinal cancer: Light and shade of intrahepatic arterial radiotherapy in mCRC.Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug;13(8):467-8. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.92. Epub 2016 Jun 14. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27296298 No abstract available.
-
Reply to E.C. Harrold et al and A.O. Ayoola et al.J Clin Oncol. 2016 Dec;34(34):4194-4195. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.4554. Epub 2016 Sep 30. J Clin Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27621391 No abstract available.
-
Selective Internal Radiation Therapy/Yttrium-90: Have We Found Its Place?J Clin Oncol. 2016 Dec;34(34):4193. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.6782. Epub 2016 Sep 30. J Clin Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27621399 No abstract available.
-
SIRFLOX: Progression-Free Survival in the Liver As a Surrogate End Point for Survival?J Clin Oncol. 2016 Dec;34(34):4193. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.3523. Epub 2016 Sep 30. J Clin Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27621405 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
