Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016:2016:9736564.
doi: 10.1155/2016/9736564. Epub 2016 Jan 21.

Myeloablative Conditioning with PBSC Grafts for T Cell-Replete Haploidentical Donor Transplantation Using Posttransplant Cyclophosphamide

Affiliations
Review

Myeloablative Conditioning with PBSC Grafts for T Cell-Replete Haploidentical Donor Transplantation Using Posttransplant Cyclophosphamide

Scott R Solomon et al. Adv Hematol. 2016.

Abstract

Relapse is the main cause of treatment failure after nonmyeloablative haploidentical transplant (haplo-HSCT). In an attempt to reduce relapse, we have developed a myeloablative (MA) haplo-HSCT approach utilizing posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PT/Cy) and peripheral blood stem cells as the stem cell source. We summarize the results of two consecutive clinical trials, using a busulfan-based (n = 20) and a TBI-based MA preparative regimen (n = 30), and analyze a larger cohort of 64 patients receiving MA haplo-HSCT. All patients have engrafted with full donor chimerism and no late graft failures. Grade III-IV acute GVHD and moderate-severe chronic GVHD occurred in 23% and 30%, respectively. One-year NRM was 10%. Predicted three-year overall survival, disease-free survival, and relapse were 53%, 53%, and 26%, respectively, in all patients and 79%, 74%, and 9%, respectively, in patients with a low/intermediate disease risk index (DRI). In multivariate analysis, DRI was the most significant predictor of survival and relapse. Use of TBI (versus busulfan) had no significant impact on survival but was associated with significantly less BK virus-associated hemorrhagic cystitis. We contrast our results with other published reports of MA haplo-HSCT PT/Cy in the literature and attempt to define the comparative utility of MA haplo-HSCT to other methods of transplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival, disease-free survival, and nonrelapse mortality and following TBI-based MA haplo-HSCT.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of disease risk index on (a) disease-free survival and (b) relapse following MA haplo-HSCT.

References

    1. Gragert L., Eapen M., Williams E., et al. HLA match likelihoods for hematopoietic stem-cell grafts in the U.S. registry. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2014;371(4):339–348. doi: 10.1056/nejmsa1311707. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beatty P. G., Clift R. A., Mickelson E. M., et al. Marrow transplantation from related donors other than HLA-identical siblings. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1985;313(13):765–771. doi: 10.1056/nejm198509263131301. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Szydlo R., Goldman J. M., Klein J. P., et al. Results of allogeneic bone marrow transplants for leukemia using donors other than HLA-identical siblings. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1997;15(5):1767–1777. - PubMed
    1. Aversa F., Terenzi A., Tabilio A., et al. Full haplotype-mismatched hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation: a phase II study in patients with acute leukemia at high risk of relapse. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2005;23(15):3447–3454. doi: 10.1200/jco.2005.09.117. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Luznik L., O'Donnell P. V., Symons H. J., et al. HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation for hematologic malignancies using nonmyeloablative conditioning and high-dose, posttransplantation cyclophosphamide. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2008;14(6):641–650. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.03.005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources