Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb;4(3):46.
doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2016.01.03.

STARD guideline in diagnostic accuracy tests: perspective from a systematic reviewer

Affiliations

STARD guideline in diagnostic accuracy tests: perspective from a systematic reviewer

Zhi-De Hu. Ann Transl Med. 2016 Feb.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Number of papers retrieved from PubMed using the keyword “diagnostic[TI]”.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. Clin Chem 2003;49:1-6. - PubMed
    1. Coppus SF, van der Veen F, Bossuyt PM, et al. Quality of reporting of test accuracy studies in reproductive medicine: impact of the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) initiative. Fertil Steril 2006;86:1321-9. - PubMed
    1. Smidt N, Rutjes AW, van der Windt DA, et al. The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: has it improved? Neurology 2006;67:792-7. - PubMed
    1. Korevaar DA, van Enst WA, Spijker R, et al. Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD. Evid Based Med 2014;19:47-54. - PubMed
    1. Hu ZD, Wei TT, Yang M, et al. Diagnostic value of osteopontin in ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review. PLoS One 2015;10:e0126444. - PMC - PubMed