Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr;25(4):1266-81.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4455-y. Epub 2016 Feb 23.

Intra-articular facet joint injections for low back pain: a systematic review

Affiliations

Intra-articular facet joint injections for low back pain: a systematic review

Rajni Vekaria et al. Eur Spine J. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: Evidence supporting the use of therapeutic intra-articular facet joint injections for patients with suspected facet joint pain is sparse. A systematic review including a narrative synthesis was carried out to determine if intra-articular facet joint injections with active drug are more effective in reducing back pain and back pain-related disability than a sham procedure or a placebo/inactive injection. Secondly, to determine if intra-articular facet joint injections with active drug or placebo/inactive injection are more effective in reducing back pain and back pain-related disability than conservative treatment.

Methods: Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Index to Chiropractic Literature and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception through April 2015. Data were screened and single extraction with independent verification and risk of bias assessment was performed.

Results: A total of 391 records were screened, and six trials were included. The trials included were small (range 18-109 participants) and overall in terms of pain and disability outcomes most were inconclusive. Only two of the trials report any significant between-group differences in pain (mean difference -1.0, 95% CI -2.0 to -0.1) and (p = 0.032) or disability (mean difference -3.0, 95% CI -6.2 to 0.2) and (p = 0.013) outcomes.

Conclusions: The studies found here were clinically diverse and precluded any meta-analysis. A number of methodological issues were identified. The positive results, whilst interpreted with caution, do suggest that there is a need for further high-quality work in this area.

Keywords: Disability; Intra-articular facet joint injections; Low back pain; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2163-96 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989 Aug;71(4):681-4 - PubMed
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 15;34(18):1929-41 - PubMed
    1. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2004 May 28;5:15 - PubMed
    1. J Anat. 1982 Mar;134(Pt 2):383-97 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources