Anamorelin in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and cachexia (ROMANA 1 and ROMANA 2): results from two randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trials
- PMID: 26906526
- DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00558-6
Anamorelin in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and cachexia (ROMANA 1 and ROMANA 2): results from two randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trials
Abstract
Background: Patients with advanced cancer frequently experience anorexia and cachexia, which are associated with reduced food intake, altered body composition, and decreased functionality. We assessed anamorelin, a novel ghrelin-receptor agonist, on cachexia in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and cachexia.
Methods: ROMANA 1 and ROMANA 2 were randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials done at 93 sites in 19 countries. Patients with inoperable stage III or IV non-small-cell lung cancer and cachexia (defined as ≥5% weight loss within 6 months or body-mass index <20 kg/m(2)) were randomly assigned 2:1 to anamorelin 100 mg orally once daily or placebo, with a computer-generated randomisation algorithm stratified by geographical region, cancer treatment status, and weight loss over the previous 6 months. Co-primary efficacy endpoints were the median change in lean body mass and handgrip strength over 12 weeks and were measured in all study participants (intention-to-treat population). Both trials are now completed and are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT01387269 and NCT01387282.
Findings: From July 8, 2011, to Jan 28, 2014, 484 patients were enrolled in ROMANA 1 (323 to anamorelin, 161 to placebo), and from July 14, 2011, to Oct 31, 2013, 495 patients were enrolled in ROMANA 2 (330 to anamorelin, 165 to placebo). Over 12 weeks, lean body mass increased in patients assigned to anamorelin compared with those assigned to placebo in ROMANA 1 (median increase 0·99 kg [95% CI 0·61 to 1·36] vs -0·47 kg [-1·00 to 0·21], p<0·0001) and ROMANA 2 (0·65 kg [0·38 to 0·91] vs -0·98 kg [-1·49 to -0·41], p<0·0001). We noted no difference in handgrip strength in ROMANA 1 (-1·10 kg [-1·69 to -0·40] vs -1·58 kg [-2·99 to -1·14], p=0·15) or ROMANA 2 (-1·49 kg [-2·06 to -0·58] vs -0·95 kg [-1·56 to 0·04], p=0·65). There were no differences in grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events between study groups; the most common grade 3-4 adverse event was hyperglycaemia, occurring in one (<1%) of 320 patients given anamorelin in ROMANA 1 and in four (1%) of 330 patients given anamorelin in ROMANA 2.
Interpretation: Anamorelin significantly increased lean body mass, but not handgrip, strength in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Considering the unmet medical need for safe and effective treatments for cachexia, anamorelin might be a treatment option for patients with cancer anorexia and cachexia.
Funding: Helsinn Therapeutics.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Targeting cancer cachexia: we're on the way.Lancet Oncol. 2016 Apr;17(4):414-415. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00085-1. Epub 2016 Feb 20. Lancet Oncol. 2016. PMID: 26906527 No abstract available.
-
Cachexia in patients with cancer.Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jun;17(6):e220-e221. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30057-2. Lancet Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27299271 No abstract available.
-
Cachexia in patients with cancer.Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jun;17(6):e220. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00167-4. Lancet Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27299272 No abstract available.
-
On the ROMANA 1 and 2 studies on anamorelin.Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jun;23(6):e236. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00268-6. Lancet Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35654053 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical