Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun;64(6):1232-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.02.022. Epub 2016 Feb 22.

HCV kinetic and modeling analyses indicate similar time to cure among sofosbuvir combination regimens with daclatasvir, simeprevir or ledipasvir

Affiliations

HCV kinetic and modeling analyses indicate similar time to cure among sofosbuvir combination regimens with daclatasvir, simeprevir or ledipasvir

Harel Dahari et al. J Hepatol. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Background & aims: Recent clinical trials of direct-acting-antiviral agents (DAAs) against hepatitis C virus (HCV) achieved >90% sustained virological response (SVR) rates, suggesting that cure often took place before the end of treatment (EOT). We sought to evaluate retrospectively whether early response kinetics can provide the basis to individualize therapy to achieve optimal results while reducing duration and cost.

Methods: 58 chronic HCV patients were treated with 12-week sofosbuvir+simeprevir (n=19), sofosbuvir+daclatasvir (n=19), or sofosbuvir+ledipasvir in three French referral centers. HCV was measured at baseline, day 2, every other week, EOT and 12weeks post EOT. Mathematical modeling was used to predict the time to cure, i.e., <1 virus copy in the entire extracellular body fluid.

Results: All but one patient who relapsed achieved SVR. Mean age was 60±11years, 53% were male, 86% HCV genotype-1, 9% HIV coinfected, 43% advanced fibrosis (F3), and 57% had cirrhosis. At weeks 2, 4 and 6, 48%, 88% and 100% of patients had HCV<15IU/ml, with 27%, 74% and 91% of observations having target not detected, respectively. Modeling results predicted that 23 (43%), 16 (30%), 7 (13%), 5 (9%) and 3 (5%) subjects were predicted to reach cure within 6, 8, 10, 12 and 13weeks of therapy, respectively. The modeling suggested that the patient who relapsed would have benefitted from an additional week of sofosbuvir+ledipasvir. Adjusting duration of treatment according to the modeling predicts reduced medication costs of 43-45% and 17-30% in subjects who had HCV<15IU/ml at weeks 2 and 4, respectively.

Conclusions: The use of early viral kinetic analysis has the potential to individualize duration of DAA therapy with a projected average cost saving of 16-20% per 100-treated persons.

Keywords: Duration of therapy; HCV; Mathematical modeling; SVR; Viral kinetics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: None of the authors has any financial interest or conflict of interest related to this research. Writing Assistance: None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Viral kinetics
(A) Time (days) to reach HCV <15 IU/ml (target detected or not). (B) Time to reach target not detected, TND. No difference (P=0.7, Fisher Exact Test) was found between treatment groups. SOF, sofosbuvir; DAC, daclatasvir; SIM, simeprevir; LEDI, ledipasvir.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Observed viral kinetics and model predicted curves in 30 representative subjects
Pink diamonds: observed HCV viral load above the limit of quantification, LOQ (>15 IU/mL); green triangles, observed HCV < LOQ but still detected; blue squares, observed HCV viral load below the limit of detection; solid lines, biphasic model (Eq. 1) best fit curves (see Table 2 for individual parameters). Sofosbuvir in combination with daclatasvir (D), simeprevir (S), or ledipasvir (L). HCV viral load and fit curves of the remaining 24 subjects are shown in Fig. S2.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Projected treatment duration (weeks) to reach cure based on a viral cure boundary defined as <1 virus copy in entire patient extracellular fluid (~13.5L). SOF, sofosbuvir; DAC, daclatasvir; SIM, simeprevir; LEDI, ledipasvir.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Webster DP, Klenerman P, Dusheiko GM. Lancet. 2015;385:1124–35. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schinazi R, Halfon P, Marcellin P, Asselah T. Liver Int. 2014;34(Suppl 1):69–78. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bourliere M, Bronowicki JP, de Ledinghen V, Hezode C, Zoulim F, Mathurin P, et al. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15:397–404. - PubMed
    1. Reddy KR, Bourliere M, Sulkowski M, Omata M, Zeuzem S, Feld JJ, et al. Hepatology. 2015 - PubMed
    1. Sulkowski MS, Naggie S, Lalezari J, Fessel WJ, Mounzer K, Shuhart M, et al. JAMA. 2014;312:353–61. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms