Increased yield of actionable mutations using multi-gene panels to assess hereditary cancer susceptibility in an ethnically diverse clinical cohort
- PMID: 26908360
- PMCID: PMC4835267
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2015.12.013
Increased yield of actionable mutations using multi-gene panels to assess hereditary cancer susceptibility in an ethnically diverse clinical cohort
Abstract
This study aims to assess multi-gene panel testing in an ethnically diverse clinical cancer genetics practice. We conducted a retrospective study of individuals with a personal or family history of cancer undergoing clinically indicated multi-gene panel tests of 6-110 genes, from six commercial laboratories. The 475 patients in the study included 228 Hispanics (47.6%), 166 non-Hispanic Whites (35.4%), 55 Asians (11.6%), 19 Blacks (4.0%), and seven others (1.5%). Panel testing found that 15.6% (74/475) of patients carried deleterious mutations for a total of 79 mutations identified. This included 7.4% (35/475) of patients who had a mutation identified that would not have been tested with a gene-by-gene approach. The identification of a panel-added mutation impacted clinical management for most of cases (69%, 24/35), and genetic testing was recommended for the first degree relatives of nearly all of them (91%, 32/35). Variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) were identified in a higher proportion of tests performed in ethnic minorities. Multi-gene panel testing increases the yield of mutations detected and adds to the capability of providing individualized cancer risk assessment. VUSs represent an interpretive challenge due to less data available outside of White, non-Hispanic populations. Further studies are necessary to expand understanding of the implementation and utilization of panels across broad clinical settings and patient populations.
Keywords: Hereditary cancer; cancer risk assessment; ethnic minorities; multi-gene panels; variants of uncertain significance.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The other co-authors do not have any potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Rescreening for genetic mutations using multi-gene panel testing in patients who previously underwent non-informative genetic screening.Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Nov;139(2):211-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Aug 18. Gynecol Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26296696
-
Clinical Actionability of Multigene Panel Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk Assessment.JAMA Oncol. 2015 Oct;1(7):943-51. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2690. JAMA Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26270727
-
Multi-gene panel testing for hereditary cancer susceptibility in a rural Familial Cancer Program.Fam Cancer. 2017 Jan;16(1):159-166. doi: 10.1007/s10689-016-9913-5. Fam Cancer. 2017. PMID: 27401692
-
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: diagnostic strategies and their implications.Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007 May;(150):1-180. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007. PMID: 17764220 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Genetic risk assessment and prevention: the role of genetic testing panels in breast cancer.Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2015;15(11):1315-26. doi: 10.1586/14737140.2015.1090879. Epub 2015 Nov 2. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2015. PMID: 26523341 Review.
Cited by
-
Psychosocial outcomes following germline multigene panel testing in an ethnically and economically diverse cohort of patients.Cancer. 2021 Apr 15;127(8):1275-1285. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33357. Epub 2020 Dec 15. Cancer. 2021. PMID: 33320347 Free PMC article.
-
Genetic Basis of Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Approaches and Lessons Learnt from Three Decades of Inherited Predisposition Testing.Genes (Basel). 2024 Feb 8;15(2):219. doi: 10.3390/genes15020219. Genes (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38397209 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical utility of hereditary cancer panel testing: Impact of PALB2, ATM, CHEK2, NBN, BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D results on patient management and adherence to provider recommendations.Cancer. 2020 Feb 1;126(3):549-558. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32572. Epub 2019 Nov 4. Cancer. 2020. PMID: 31682005 Free PMC article.
-
Association between Health Insurance Type and Genetic Testing and/or Counseling for Breast and Ovarian Cancer.J Pers Med. 2022 Jul 31;12(8):1263. doi: 10.3390/jpm12081263. J Pers Med. 2022. PMID: 36013212 Free PMC article.
-
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Germline Genetic Testing of Patients With Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Feb;20(2):353-361.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.12.025. Epub 2020 Dec 24. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022. PMID: 33359728 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Tung N, Battelli C, Allen B, et al. Frequency of mutations in individuals with breast cancer referred for BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing using next-generation sequencing with a 25-gene panel. Cancer. 2015;121:25–33. - PubMed
-
- Mauer CB, Pirzadeh-Miller SM, Robinson LD, Euhus DM. The integration of next-generation sequencing panels in the clinical cancer genetics practice: an institutional experience. Genet Med. 2014;16:407–412. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical