Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar 1;213(5):694-702.
doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv326. Epub 2015 Jun 8.

Transfusion-Transmitted Dengue and Associated Clinical Symptoms During the 2012 Epidemic in Brazil

Collaborators, Affiliations

Transfusion-Transmitted Dengue and Associated Clinical Symptoms During the 2012 Epidemic in Brazil

Ester C Sabino et al. J Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: A linked donor-recipient study was conducted during epidemics in 2 cities in Brazil to investigate transfusion-transmitted (TT) dengue virus (DENV) by DENV RNA-positive donations.

Methods: During February-June 2012, samples were collected from donors and recipients and retrospectively tested for DENV RNA by transcription-mediated amplification. Recipient chart review, using a case (DENV positive)-control (DENV negative and not known to be exposed) design, was conducted to assess symptoms.

Results: Of 39 134 recruited blood donors, DENV-4 viremia was confirmed in 0.51% of donations from subjects in Rio de Janeiro and 0.80% of subjects in Recife. Overall, 42 DENV RNA-positive units were transfused into 35 recipients. Of these, 16 RNA-positive units transfused into 16 susceptible recipients were identified as informative: 5 cases were considered probable TT cases, 1 possible TT case, and 10 nontransmissions. The TT rate was 37.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.2%-64.6%), significantly higher than the viremia rate of 0.93% (95% CI, .11%-3.34%) in nonexposed recipients (P < .0001). Chart review did not find significant differences between cases and controls in symptoms or mortality.

Conclusions: During a large epidemic of DENV-4 infection in Brazil, >0.5% of donations were RNA positive, and approximately one third of components resulted in TT. However, no significant clinical differences were evident between RNA-positive and RNA-negative recipients.

Keywords: NAT; clinical symptoms; dengue; transfusion-transmission.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow chart defining blood donor and recipient dengue virus (DENV) RNA testing results and selection of subjects for analysis of clinical manifestations. Abbreviations: −, negative; +, positive; D, donor; R, recipient; TMA, transcription-mediated amplification assay.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Time to occurrence of symptoms consistent with dengue fever. Symptoms status for case and control patients during the 45-day chart review period. A, Comparison of all cases, defined as persons receiving a dengue virus (DENV) RNA–positive unit and/or who tested positive for DENV RNA, to controls. B, Comparison of cases, separated into 3 groups based on whether a patient tested positive for DENV RNA and/or was exposed to a DENV RNA–positive unit, to controls. The number of subjects at risk for each group and at each time point of interest are listed at the bottom of the graphs. The number at risk at each specific time point is the number of remaining subjects after all of the events and censoring (time of loss-to-follow-up in the medical chart and indicated with by + sign in each plot) have been accounted for. Abbreviations: −, negative; +, positive; D, donor; R, recipient.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Survival status for case and control patients during the 45-day chart review period. A, Comparison of all cases, defined as persons receiving a dengue virus (DENV) RNA–positive unit and/or who tested positive for DENV RNA, to controls. B, Comparison of cases, separated into 3 groups based on whether a patient tested positive for DENV RNA and/or was exposed to a DENV RNA–positive unit, to controls. The number of subjects at risk for each group and at each time point of interest are listed at the bottom of the graphs. The number at risk at each specific time point is the number of remaining subjects after all of the events and censoring (time of loss-to-follow-up in the medical chart and indicated with by + sign in each plot) have been accounted for. Abbreviations: −, negative; +, positive; D, donor; R, recipient.

Comment in

  • Dengue Virus and Blood Transfusion.
    Levi JE. Levi JE. J Infect Dis. 2016 Mar 1;213(5):689-90. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv322. Epub 2015 Jun 8. J Infect Dis. 2016. PMID: 26908779 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bianco C. Dengue and Chikungunya viruses in blood donations: risks to the blood supply? Transfusion 2008; 48:1279–81. - PubMed
    1. Chuang V, Wong TY, Leung YH et al. . Review of dengue fever cases in Hong Kong during 1998 to 2005. Hong Kong Med J 2008; 14:170–7. - PubMed
    1. Holmes EC, Twiddy SS. The origin, emergence and evolutionary genetics of dengue virus. Infect Genet Evol 2003; 3:19–28. - PubMed
    1. Laughlin CA, Morens DM, Cassetti MC et al. . Dengue research opportunities in the Americas. J Infect Dis 2012; 206:1121–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mackenzie JS, Gubler DJ, Petersen LR. Emerging flaviviruses: the spread and resurgence of Japanese encephalitis, West Nile and dengue viruses. Nat Med 2004; 10:S98–109. - PubMed

Publication types