Protective Effect of Contemporary Pertussis Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- PMID: 26908803
- PMCID: PMC4826451
- DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciw051
Protective Effect of Contemporary Pertussis Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Acellular pertussis (aP) and whole-cell (wP) pertussis vaccines are presumed to have similar short-term (<3 years after completion of the primary series) efficacy. However, vaccine effect varies between individual pertussis vaccine formulations, and many originally studied formulations are now unavailable. An updated analysis of the short-term protective effect of pertussis vaccines limited to formulations currently on the market in developed countries is needed.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies that evaluated pertussis vaccine efficacy or effectiveness within 3 years after completion (>3 doses) of a primary series of a currently available aP or wP vaccine formulation. The primary outcome was based on the World Health Organization (WHO) clinical case definitions for pertussis. Study quality was assessed using the approach developed by the Child Health Epidemiology Research Group. We determined overall effect sizes using random-effects meta-analyses, stratified by vaccine (aP or wP) and study (efficacy or effectiveness) type.
Results: Meta-analysis of 2 aP vaccine efficacy studies (assessing the 3-component GlaxoSmithKline and 5-component Sanofi-Pasteur formulations) yielded an overall aP vaccine efficacy of 84% (95% confidence interval [CI], 81%-87%). Meta-analysis of 3 wP vaccine effectiveness studies (assessing the Behringwerke, Pasteur/Mérieux, and SmithKline Beecham formulations) yielded an overall wP vaccine effectiveness of 94% (95% CI, 88%-97%) (bothI(2)= 0%).
Conclusions: Although all contemporary aP and wP formulations protect against pertussis disease, in this meta-analysis the point estimate for short-term protective effect against WHO-defined pertussis in young children was lower for currently available aP vaccines than wP vaccines.
Keywords: acellular; meta-analysis; pertussis; vaccine efficacy/effectiveness; whole-cell.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail journals.permissions@oup.com.
Figures




References
-
- Adams DA, Jajosky RA, Ajani U et al. . Summary of notifiable diseases—United States, 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2014; 61:1–121. - PubMed
-
- NNDSS Annual Report Writing Group. Australia's notifiable disease status, 2012: annual report of the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep 2015; 39:E46–136. - PubMed
-
- Tan TQ, Trindade E, Skowronski D. Epidemiology of pertussis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2005; 24(5 suppl):S10–8. - PubMed
-
- Wendelboe AM, Van Rie A, Salmaso S, Englund JA. Duration of immunity against pertussis after natural infection or vaccination. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2005; 24(5 suppl):S58–61. - PubMed
-
- Klein NP, Bartlett J, Rowhani-Rahbar A, Fireman B, Baxter R. Waning protection after fifth dose of acellular pertussis vaccine in children. N Engl J Med 2012; 367:1012–9. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical