A systematic review of dosing frequency with bone-targeted agents for patients with bone metastases from breast cancer
- PMID: 26909282
- PMCID: PMC4723383
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2013.05.001
A systematic review of dosing frequency with bone-targeted agents for patients with bone metastases from breast cancer
Abstract
Background: Bone-targeted agents are usually administered to breast cancer patients with bone metastases every 3-4 weeks. Less frequent ('de-escalated') treatment may provide similar benefits with improved safety and reduced cost.
Methods: To systematically review randomised trials comparing de-escalated treatment with bone-targeted agents (i.e. every 12-16 weeks) to standard treatment (i.e. every 3-4 weeks), a formal systematic review of the literature was performed. Two individuals independently screened citations and full text articles. Random effects meta-analyses of clinically important outcomes were planned provided homogeneous studies were identified.
Results: Five relevant studies (n=1287 patients) were identified. Sample size ranged from 38 to 425. Information on outcomes including occurrence of SREs, bone pain, urinary N-telopeptide concentrations, serum C-telopeptide concentrations, pain medication use and safety outcomes was not consistently available. Two trials were non-inferiority studies, two dose-response evaluations and one was a pilot study. Bone-targeted agents use varied between studies, as did duration of prior therapy. Patient populations were considered heterogeneous in several ways, and thus no meta-analyses were performed. Observations from the included studies suggest there is potential that 3 month de-escalated treatment may provide similar benefits compared to 3-4 weekly treatment and that lower doses of zoledronic acid and denosumab might be equally effective.
Conclusions: Studies comparing standard and de-escalated treatment with bone-targeted agents in breast cancer are rare. The benefits of standard treatment compared to de-escalated therapy on important clinical outcomes remain unclear. Future pragmatic studies must be conducted to determine the merits of this approach.
Keywords: Bone metastasis; Breast cancer; De-escalated treatment; Systematic review.
Figures
References
-
- Verma S., Kerr-Cresswell D., Dranitsaris G., Charbonneau F., Trudeau M., Yogendran G. Bisphosphonate use for the management of breast cancer patients with bone metastases: a survey of Canadian Medical Oncologists. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2004;12(12):852–858. - PubMed
-
- Kimmel D.B. Mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile, and clinical applications of nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates. Journal of Dental Research. 2007;86:1022–1033. - PubMed
-
- Doshi S., Sutjandra L., Zeng J., Sohn W., Peterson M., Jang G. Denosumab dose selection for patients with bone metastases from solid tumor. Clinical Cancer Research. 2012;18(9):2648–2657. - PubMed
-
- Rosen L.S., Gordon D., Kaminski M., Howell A., Belch A., Mackey J. Long-term efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid compared with pamidronate disodium in the treatment of skeletal complications in patients with advanced multiple myeloma or breast carcinoma: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, comparative trial. Cancer. 2003;98:1735–1744. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources