Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 May 15;2(3):123-31.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2013.05.001. eCollection 2013 Sep.

A systematic review of dosing frequency with bone-targeted agents for patients with bone metastases from breast cancer

Affiliations
Review

A systematic review of dosing frequency with bone-targeted agents for patients with bone metastases from breast cancer

Brian Hutton et al. J Bone Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: Bone-targeted agents are usually administered to breast cancer patients with bone metastases every 3-4 weeks. Less frequent ('de-escalated') treatment may provide similar benefits with improved safety and reduced cost.

Methods: To systematically review randomised trials comparing de-escalated treatment with bone-targeted agents (i.e. every 12-16 weeks) to standard treatment (i.e. every 3-4 weeks), a formal systematic review of the literature was performed. Two individuals independently screened citations and full text articles. Random effects meta-analyses of clinically important outcomes were planned provided homogeneous studies were identified.

Results: Five relevant studies (n=1287 patients) were identified. Sample size ranged from 38 to 425. Information on outcomes including occurrence of SREs, bone pain, urinary N-telopeptide concentrations, serum C-telopeptide concentrations, pain medication use and safety outcomes was not consistently available. Two trials were non-inferiority studies, two dose-response evaluations and one was a pilot study. Bone-targeted agents use varied between studies, as did duration of prior therapy. Patient populations were considered heterogeneous in several ways, and thus no meta-analyses were performed. Observations from the included studies suggest there is potential that 3 month de-escalated treatment may provide similar benefits compared to 3-4 weekly treatment and that lower doses of zoledronic acid and denosumab might be equally effective.

Conclusions: Studies comparing standard and de-escalated treatment with bone-targeted agents in breast cancer are rare. The benefits of standard treatment compared to de-escalated therapy on important clinical outcomes remain unclear. Future pragmatic studies must be conducted to determine the merits of this approach.

Keywords: Bone metastasis; Breast cancer; De-escalated treatment; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Systematic review supplement: PRISMA flow diagram.

References

    1. Coleman R.E., Smith P., Rubens R.D. Clinical course and prognostic factors following bone recurrence from breast cancer. British Journal of Cancer. 1998;77(2):336–340. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Verma S., Kerr-Cresswell D., Dranitsaris G., Charbonneau F., Trudeau M., Yogendran G. Bisphosphonate use for the management of breast cancer patients with bone metastases: a survey of Canadian Medical Oncologists. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2004;12(12):852–858. - PubMed
    1. Kimmel D.B. Mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile, and clinical applications of nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates. Journal of Dental Research. 2007;86:1022–1033. - PubMed
    1. Doshi S., Sutjandra L., Zeng J., Sohn W., Peterson M., Jang G. Denosumab dose selection for patients with bone metastases from solid tumor. Clinical Cancer Research. 2012;18(9):2648–2657. - PubMed
    1. Rosen L.S., Gordon D., Kaminski M., Howell A., Belch A., Mackey J. Long-term efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid compared with pamidronate disodium in the treatment of skeletal complications in patients with advanced multiple myeloma or breast carcinoma: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, comparative trial. Cancer. 2003;98:1735–1744. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources