A Closer Look at the 2013 to 2014 Integrated Plastic Surgery Match
- PMID: 26910706
- DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000475824.09531.21
A Closer Look at the 2013 to 2014 Integrated Plastic Surgery Match
Abstract
Background: Plastic surgery has become an increasingly competitive, yet limited information is available in the literature on successfully matched plastic surgery applicants. The goal of this study was to analyze which factors predicted a successful National Residency Match Program match during the 2013 to 2014 cycle.
Methods: An electronic questionnaire was distributed to successfully matched medical students in plastic surgery. Information obtained included (1) academic performance, (2) medical school criteria, (3) visiting subinternship rotation criteria, and (4) research performance. Match "success" was defined as matching into one of the applicant's top three ranked programs
Results: Data were available for 127 matched students. Average Step 1 score was 247.93 (95 percent CI, 244.3 to 251.56). Step 1 scores correlated with the number of interviews received (r(2) = 0.355; p = 0.039). An odds ratio of 2.2 was observed for residents who had a plastic surgery residency program affiliated with their medical school and match success. Step 1 score (r(2) = 0.045; p = 0.798), Step 2 score (r(2) = 0.131; p = 0.505), Alpha Omega Alpha membership (r(2) = 0.011; p = 0.905), and number of publications (r(2) = 0.121; p = 0.458) did not correlate significantly with match success.
Conclusions: Successful applicants had a Step 1 score that was 1 SD greater than the U.S. mean. Having a plastic surgery residency program affiliated with an applicant's medical school was an important predictor of match success. Objective measures (step scores, Alpha Omega Alpha membership, and number of publications) were not predictive of match success.
Comment in
-
Discussion: A Closer Look at the 2013 to 2014 Integrated Plastic Surgery Match.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Mar;137(3):630e-631e. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000479984.57620.a3. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016. PMID: 26910707 No abstract available.
References
-
- Sue GR, Narayan D. Generation Y and the integrated plastic surgery residency match: A cross-sectional study of the 2011 match outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2013;1:e33
-
- Fening K, Vander Horst A, Zirwas M. Correlation of USMLE Step 1 scores with performance on dermatology in-training examinations. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;64:102–106
-
- LeGrasso J, Kennedy D, Hoehn JG, Ashruf S, Przybyla AM. Selection criteria for the integrated model of plastic surgery residency. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:121e–125e
-
- Claiborne JR, Crantford JC, Swett KR, David LR. The plastic surgery match: Predicting success and improving the process. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;70:698–703
-
- Wood JS, David LR. Outcome analysis of factors impacting the plastic surgery match. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64:770–774
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources