Predicting Performance on the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Written Examination Using Resident Self-Assessment Examination Scores
- PMID: 26913103
- PMCID: PMC4763400
- DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00065.1
Predicting Performance on the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Written Examination Using Resident Self-Assessment Examination Scores
Abstract
Background: Studies across medical specialties have shown that scores on residency self-assessment examinations (SAEs) can predict performance on certifying board examinations.
Objective: This study explored the predictive abilities of different composite SAE scores in physical medicine and rehabilitation and determined an optimal cut-point to identify an "at-risk" performance group.
Methods: For our study, both predictive scores (SAE scores) and outcomes (board examination scores) are expressed in national percentile scores. We analyzed data in graduates of a physical medicine and rehabilitation residency program between 2008 and 2014. We compared mean, median, lowest, highest, and most recent score among up to 3 SAE scores with respect to their associations with the outcome via linear and logistic regression. We computed regression/correlation coefficient, P value, R (2), area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. Identification of optimal cut-point was guided by accuracy, discrimination, and model-fit statistics.
Results: Predictor and outcome data were available for 88 of 99 residents. In regression models, all SAE predictors showed significant associations (P ≤ .001) and the mean score performed best (r = 0.55). A 1-point increase in mean SAE was associated with a 1.88 score increase in board score and a 16% decrease in odds of failure. The rule of mean SAE score below 47 yielded the highest accuracy, highest discrimination, and best model fit.
Conclusions: Mean SAE score may be used to predict performance on the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation-written examination. The optimal statistical cut-point to identify the at-risk group for failure appears to be around the 47th SAE national percentile.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: The authors declare they have no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Leigh TM, Johnson TP, Pisacano NJ. Predictive validity of the American Board of Family Practice In-Training Examination. Acad Med. 1990;65(7):454–457. - PubMed
-
- Replogle WH, Johnson WD. Assessing the predictive value of the American Board of Family Practice in-training examination. Fam Med. 2004;36(3):185–188. - PubMed
-
- Waxman H, Braunstein G, Dantzker D, Goldberg S, Lefrak S, Lichstein E, et al. Performance on the internal medicine second-year residency in-training examination predicts the outcome of the ABIM certifying examination. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9(12):692–694. - PubMed
-
- Webb LC, Juul D, Reynolds CF, 3rd, Ruiz B, Ruiz P, Scheiber SC, et al. How well does the psychiatry residency in-training examination predict performance on the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology Part I Examination? Am J Psychiatry. 1996;153(6):831–832. - PubMed
-
- Juul D, Schneidman BS, Sexson SB, Fernandez F, Beresin EV, Ebert MH, et al. Relationship between Resident-In-Training Examination in psychiatry and subsequent certification examination performances. Acad Psychiatry. 2009;33(5):404–406. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
