Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb;8(1):91-5.
doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00176.1.

Analysis of Unmatched Orthopaedic Residency Applicants: Options After the Match

Analysis of Unmatched Orthopaedic Residency Applicants: Options After the Match

Steven Rivero et al. J Grad Med Educ. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Orthopaedic surgery is one of the most competitive specialties, resulting in many applicants going unmatched. Many unmatched applicants pursue a preliminary internship or research fellowship, but whether these activities make them more successful in subsequent match cycles has not been studied.

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of activities during the intervening period on match success in a subsequent cycle.

Methods: After reviewing rank order lists for our program and National Resident Matching Program correspondence from 1994 to 2013, we identified 198 of 1216 ranked applicants (16.3%) who did not initially match. Of these, 57 applicants who matched through the Supplemental Offer and Acceptance Program did not reapply to orthopaedics or trained overseas.

Results: Of 141 reapplicants, 56 matched into orthopaedic surgery, with 87.5% (P < .001) matching at a program in the same region where they had either completed their medical degree or postgraduate year, and 37.5% matching at their home institution (P < .001). Successful reapplicants after a research fellowship had a significantly higher number of publications than unsuccessful reapplicants (P < .05). There was no significant difference in success after research or internship (P = .80) and no significant difference in success rates for US versus international reapplicants (P = .43).

Conclusions: Success of reapplication into orthopaedic surgery may be less dependent on the route taken during the interim period, and more dependent on developing relationships with faculty at a local or regional institution.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Figures

FIGURE
FIGURE
Flowchart Illustrating Outcome and Route Taken by All Ranked Applicants at Our Institution Who Did Not Initially Match Into Orthopaedics (1994–2013) Abbreviations: FMG, foreign medical graduate; SOAP, Supplemental Offer and Acceptanace Program.

References

    1. National Resident Matching Program. Results and data: 2014 main residency match. http://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Main-Match-Results-and-Da.... Accessed October 12, 2015.
    1. Anakwenze OA, Kancherla V, Baldwin K, Levine WN, Mehta S. Orthopaedic residency applications increase after implementation of 80-hour workweek. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(5):1720–1724. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dirsch DR, Dahners LE, Adams GL, Crouch JH, Wilson FC. Correlating selection criteria with subsequent performance as residents. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;399:265–271. - PubMed
    1. Dirsch DR, Campion ER, Gilliam K. Resident selection and predictors of performance: can we be evidence based? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;449:44–49. - PubMed
    1. Egol KA, Collins J, Zuckerman JD. Success in orthopaedic training: resident selection and predictors of quality performance. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19(2):72–80. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources