Analysis of Unmatched Orthopaedic Residency Applicants: Options After the Match
- PMID: 26913110
- PMCID: PMC4763390
- DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00176.1
Analysis of Unmatched Orthopaedic Residency Applicants: Options After the Match
Abstract
Background: Orthopaedic surgery is one of the most competitive specialties, resulting in many applicants going unmatched. Many unmatched applicants pursue a preliminary internship or research fellowship, but whether these activities make them more successful in subsequent match cycles has not been studied.
Objective: To determine the effectiveness of activities during the intervening period on match success in a subsequent cycle.
Methods: After reviewing rank order lists for our program and National Resident Matching Program correspondence from 1994 to 2013, we identified 198 of 1216 ranked applicants (16.3%) who did not initially match. Of these, 57 applicants who matched through the Supplemental Offer and Acceptance Program did not reapply to orthopaedics or trained overseas.
Results: Of 141 reapplicants, 56 matched into orthopaedic surgery, with 87.5% (P < .001) matching at a program in the same region where they had either completed their medical degree or postgraduate year, and 37.5% matching at their home institution (P < .001). Successful reapplicants after a research fellowship had a significantly higher number of publications than unsuccessful reapplicants (P < .05). There was no significant difference in success after research or internship (P = .80) and no significant difference in success rates for US versus international reapplicants (P = .43).
Conclusions: Success of reapplication into orthopaedic surgery may be less dependent on the route taken during the interim period, and more dependent on developing relationships with faculty at a local or regional institution.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: The authors declare they have no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- National Resident Matching Program. Results and data: 2014 main residency match. http://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Main-Match-Results-and-Da.... Accessed October 12, 2015.
-
- Dirsch DR, Dahners LE, Adams GL, Crouch JH, Wilson FC. Correlating selection criteria with subsequent performance as residents. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;399:265–271. - PubMed
-
- Dirsch DR, Campion ER, Gilliam K. Resident selection and predictors of performance: can we be evidence based? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;449:44–49. - PubMed
-
- Egol KA, Collins J, Zuckerman JD. Success in orthopaedic training: resident selection and predictors of quality performance. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19(2):72–80. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
