Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review

Cancer Services and the Comprehensive Cancer Center

In: Cancer: Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition (Volume 3). Washington (DC): The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank; 2015 Nov 1. Chapter 11.
Free Books & Documents
Review

Cancer Services and the Comprehensive Cancer Center

Mary Gospodarowicz et al.
Free Books & Documents

Excerpt

Most countries and numerous global and local organizations are addressing the challenges of cancer (Blanchet and others 2013; Knaul, Alleyne, Atun, and others 2012), including the development of comprehensive national cancer control programs designed to reduce the number of cancer cases and deaths and to improve the quality of life of cancer patients through evidence-based strategies for prevention, early detection, diagnosis, treatment, and palliation. A national cancer control program addresses the functions and delivery of many components of cancer control (http://www.who.int/cancer/nccp/en/). The delivery of most services is anchored in comprehensive cancer centers (Gralow and others 2012; Hensher, Price, and Adomakoh 2006; Sloan and Gelband 2007).

This chapter describes an optimal framework for a comprehensive cancer center, which can be a free-standing dedicated institution, a program within an academic health science center or a community hospital, or a group of hospitals providing an integrated program.

The first section presents an overview of the framework for a comprehensive cancer center, which includes three levels that are embedded within a comprehensive cancer system. Detailed information on each level is presented, followed by a discussion of quality as an integrating theme for the framework. The chapter concludes by detailing the benefits that a comprehensive cancer center provides to a country’s cancer control and health care efforts.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists . 2013. “ASHP Guidelines: Minimum Standard for Pharmacies in Hospitals.” American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy 70: 1619–30. - PubMed
    1. Anderson B O, Lipscomb J, Murillo R H, Thomas D B. 2015. “Breast Cancer.” In Disease Control Priorities (third edition): Volume 3, Cancer, edited by Gelband H, Jha P, Sankaranarayanan R, Horton S. Washington, DC: World Bank.
    1. Anderson B O, Yip C H, Smith R A, Shyyan R, Sener S F. others. 2008. “Guideline Implementation for Breast Healthcare in Low-Income and Middle-Income Countries: Overview of the Breast Health Global Initiative Global Summit 2007.” Cancer 113 (8 Suppl.):2221–43. doi:10.1002/cncr.23844. - PubMed
    1. Atun R, Knaul F M. 2012. “Innovative Financing: Local and Global Opportunities.” In Closing the Cancer Divide: An Equity Imperative, edited by Knaul F M, Gralow J, Atun R, Bhadelia A. for the Global Task Force on Expanded Access to Cancer Care and Control in Developing Countries, chapter 8. Boston, MA: Harvard Global Equity Initiative.
    1. Baldrige Performance Excellence Program, National Institute of Standards and Technology, and U.S. Department of Commerce . 2011. 2011–2012 Health Care Criteria for Performance Excellence. Gaithersburg, MD: Baldrige. http://www.nist.gov/baldrige/publications/archive/2011_2012_healthcare_c....

LinkOut - more resources