Author's Reply re: Maternal outcomes at 3 months after planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for twin pregnancies in the Twin Birth Study: a randomised controlled trial

Affiliations

Comment

Kå Salvesen. BJOG. 2016 Mar.

. 2016 Mar;123(4):644-5.

doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13770.

¹ Professor at Norwegian University for Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

No abstract available

Comment on

Maternal outcomes at 3 months after planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for twin pregnancies in the Twin Birth Study: a randomised controlled trial.
Hutton EK, Hannah ME, Ross S, Joseph KS, Ohlsson A, Asztalos EV, Willan AR, Allen AC, Armson BA, Gafni A, Mangoff K, Sanchez JJ, Barrett JF; Twin Birth Study Collaborative Group. Hutton EK, et al. BJOG. 2015 Nov;122(12):1653-62. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13597. Epub 2015 Aug 20. BJOG. 2015. PMID: 26328526 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Re: Maternal outcomes at 3 months after planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for twin pregnancies in the Twin Birth Study: a randomised controlled trial: Counselling is difficult when outcomes are associated with mode of delivery and not the plan of mode of delivery.
Hutton EK, Hannah ME, Ross S, Joseph KS, Ohlsson A, Asztalos E, Willan AR, Allen AC, Armson BA, Gafni A, Mangoff K, Sanchez JJ, Barrett JF; Twin Birth Study Collaborative Group. Hutton EK, et al. BJOG. 2016 Mar;123(4):644. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13769. BJOG. 2016. PMID: 26914900 No abstract available.