Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Feb 25;6(2):e008376.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008376.

Metformin versus placebo in combination with insulin analogues in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus-the randomised, blinded Copenhagen Insulin and Metformin Therapy (CIMT) trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Metformin versus placebo in combination with insulin analogues in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus-the randomised, blinded Copenhagen Insulin and Metformin Therapy (CIMT) trial

Louise Lundby-Christensen et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effect of metformin versus placebo both in combination with insulin analogue treatment on changes in carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Design and setting: Investigator-initiated, randomised, placebo-controlled trial with a 2 × 3 factorial design conducted at eight hospitals in Denmark.

Participants and interventions: 412 participants with type 2 diabetes (glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 7.5% (≥ 58 mmol/mol); body mass index >25 kg/m2) were in addition to open-labelled insulin treatment randomly assigned 1:1 to 18 months blinded metformin (1 g twice daily) versus placebo, aiming at an HbA1c ≤ 7.0% (≤ 53 mmol/mol).

Outcomes: The primary outcome was change in the mean carotid IMT (a marker of subclinical cardiovascular disease). HbA1c, insulin dose, weight and hypoglycaemic and serious adverse events were other prespecified outcomes.

Results: Change in the mean carotid IMT did not differ significantly between the groups (between-group difference 0.012 mm (95% CI -0.003 to 0.026), p=0.11). HbA1c was more reduced in the metformin group (between-group difference -0.42% (95% CI -0.62% to -0.23%), p<0.001)), despite the significantly lower insulin dose at end of trial in the metformin group (1.04 IU/kg (95% CI 0.94 to 1.15)) compared with placebo (1.36 IU/kg (95% CI 1.23 to 1.51), p<0.001). The metformin group gained less weight (between-group difference -2.6 kg (95% CI -3.3 to -1.8), p<0.001). The groups did not differ with regard to number of patients with severe or non-severe hypoglycaemic or other serious adverse events, but the metformin group had more non-severe hypoglycaemic episodes (4347 vs 3161, p<0.001).

Conclusions: Metformin in combination with insulin did not reduce carotid IMT despite larger reduction in HbA1c, less weight gain, and smaller insulin dose compared with placebo plus insulin. However, the trial only reached 46% of the planned sample size and lack of power may therefore have affected our results.

Trial registration number: NCT00657943; Results.

Keywords: ULTRASONOGRAPHY.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of participants through trial.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Changes in the mean carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) (mean (95% CI)) in the metformin+insulin group (red), placebo+insulin group (blue) group, and the intervention effect (yellow) from the random effects model with baseline as the covariate using multiply imputed data, adjusted for stratification variables.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Changes (mean (95% CI)) during 18 months of intervention with metformin+insulin (red) and placebo+insulin (blue) in HbA1c (A), fasting plasma glucose (B), insulin dose (C), and weight (D). Numbers on the right-hand side of the graphs indicate the absolute/relative changes from trial entry to end of trial.

References

    1. Almdal T, Scharling H, Jensen JS et al. . The independent effect of type 2 diabetes mellitus on ischemic heart disease, stroke, and death: a population-based study of 13,000 men and women with 20 years of follow-up. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1422–6. 10.1001/archinte.164.13.1422 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eeg-Olofsson K, Cederholm J, Nilsson PM et al. . New aspects of HbA1c as a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases in type 2 diabetes: an observational study from the Swedish National Diabetes Register (NDR). J Intern Med 2010;268:471–82. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2010.02265.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA et al. . Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ 2000;321:405–12. 10.1136/bmj.321.7258.405 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hemmingsen B, Lund SS, Gluud C et al. . Intensive glycaemic control for patients with type 2 diabetes: systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised clinical trials. BMJ 2011;343:d6898 10.1136/bmj.d6898 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Turnbull FM, Abraira C, Anderson RJ et al. . Intensive glucose control and macrovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2009;52:2288–98. 10.1007/s00125-009-1470-0 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data