Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb 25;6(2):e008988.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008988.

Quality of care in university hospitals in Saudi Arabia: a systematic review

Mohammed Aljuaid  1 , Fahmida Mannan  2 , Zain Chaudhry  2 , Salman Rawaf  3 , Azeem Majeed  3
Affiliations

Quality of care in university hospitals in Saudi Arabia: a systematic review

Mohammed Aljuaid et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To identify the key issues, problems, barriers and challenges particularly in relation to the quality of care in university hospitals in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), and to provide recommendations for improvement.

Methods: A systematic search was carried out using five electronic databases, for articles published between January 2004 and January 2015. We included studies conducted in university hospitals in KSA that focused on the quality of healthcare. Three independent reviewers verified that the studies met the inclusion criteria, assessed the quality of the studies and extracted their relevant characteristics. All studies were assessed using the Institute of Medicine indicators of quality of care.

Results: Of the 1430 references identified in the initial search, eight studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria. The included studies clearly highlight a need to improve the quality of healthcare delivery, specifically in areas of patient safety, clinical effectiveness and patient-centredness, at university hospitals in KSA. Problems with quality of care could be due to failures of leadership, a requirement for better management and a need to establish a culture of safety alongside leadership reform in university hospitals. Lack of instructions given to patients and language communication were key factors impeding optimum delivery of patient-centred care. Decision-makers in KSA university hospitals should consider programmes and assessment tools to reveal problems and issues related to language as a barrier to quality of care.

Conclusions: This review exemplifies the need for further improvement in the quality of healthcare in university hospitals in KSA. Many of the problems identified in this review could be addressed by establishing an independent body in KSA, which could monitor healthcare services and push for improvements in efficiency and quality of care.

Keywords: HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION & MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC HEALTH.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of study selection process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Walston S, Al-Harbi Y, Al-Omar B. The changing face of healthcare in Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med 2008;28:243–50. 10.4103/0256-4947.51704 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jannadi B, Alshammari H, Khan A et al. Current Structure and Future Challenges for the Healthcare System in Saudi Arabia. Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management 2008;3:43–50.
    1. Almalki M, Fitzgerald G, Clark M. Health care system in Saudi Arabia: an overview. East Mediterr Health J 2011;17:784–93. - PubMed
    1. Almasabi M. An overview of health system in Saudi Arabia. Res J Med Sci [P] 2013;7:70–4.
    1. WHO. Country cooperation strategy for WHO and Saudi Arabia 2012–2016. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 2013.

Publication types