Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 May;11(3):333-42.
doi: 10.1097/COH.0000000000000260.

The protease inhibitors and HIV-associated bone loss

Affiliations
Review

The protease inhibitors and HIV-associated bone loss

Caitlin A Moran et al. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2016 May.

Abstract

Purpose of review: HIV infection is an established risk factor for osteoporosis and bone fracture. Combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) increases bone resorption leading to an additional 2-6% bone mineral density (BMD) loss within the first 1-2 years of therapy. Although tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is often blamed for antiretroviral drug-associated bone loss, evidence abounds to suggest that other agents, including the protease inhibitors (PIs), have adverse bone effects. In the current review, we examine bone loss associated with protease inhibitor use, describing the relative magnitude of bone loss reported for individual protease inhibitors. We also review the potential mechanisms associated with protease inhibitor-induced bone loss.

Recent findings: As a class, protease inhibitors contribute to a greater degree of bone loss than other anchor drugs. HIV disease reversal and the associated immune reconstitution following cART initiation play an important role in protease inhibitor-mediated bone loss in addition to plausible direct effects of protease inhibitors on bone cells.

Summary: Protease inhibitors remain an important component of cART despite their adverse effects on bone. A better understanding of factors that drive HIV/cART-induced bone loss is needed to stem the rising rate of fracture in the HIV-infected population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy in Early Asymptomatic HIV Infection. New England Journal of Medicine. 2015;373(9):795–807. The START study demonstrated that initiation of cART regardless of CD4 cell count was beneficial over delayed initiation of therapy, and has significant implications for clinical practice. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gunthard HF, Aberg JA, Eron JJ, et al. Antiretroviral treatment of adult HIV infection: 2014 recommendations of the International Antiviral Society-USA Panel. Jama. 2014;312(4):410–25. - PubMed
    1. World Health Orgaization. Guideline on when to start antiretroviral therapy and on pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV. 2015 [updated September 2015; cited 2015 October 30, 2015]. Available from: http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/guidelines/earlyrelease-arv/en/ - PubMed
    1. Harrison KM, Song R, Zhang X. Life expectancy after HIV diagnosis based on national HIV surveillance data from 25 states, United States. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes. 2010;53(1):124–30. - PubMed
    1. Aberg JA. Aging, inflammation, and HIV infection. Topics in antiviral medicine. 2012;20(3):101–5. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms