Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1977 Oct;79(2):193-202.
doi: 10.1017/s0022172400052992.

Attempts to control clothes-borne infection in a burn unit. I. Experimental investigations of some clothes for barrier nursing

Attempts to control clothes-borne infection in a burn unit. I. Experimental investigations of some clothes for barrier nursing

A Hambraeus et al. J Hyg (Lond). 1977 Oct.

Abstract

Clothes-borne transmission is an important way of spread of infection from patient to patient which is not interrupted by common cotton gowns. New barrier garments were designed from spun-bonded olefin that, in particle penetration tests, was 100 times better as a filter than cotton cloth. Three designs, a gown, a loose coverall and a close overall, were compared with each other and with conventional cotton gowns in experimental exercise and nursing procedures. Staphylococcus aureus from burned patients were used as markers. The close coverall was 4-7 times better than the loose coverall or gown in preventing the soiling of clothes worn underneath it, but appeared to permit substantially more transfer from garments underneath it to a mock 'patient' and to the air than did the looser garments. A cotton gown reduced the soiling of clothes underneath it by more than 10 times and the contamination of a mock patient by more than 30 times as compared with no barrier garment. The close coverall further diminished the contamination of clothes but not the transfer to the patient. The possible mechanisms for the discrepancy between particle transmission tests annd experimental porcedures are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Hyg (Lond). 1976 Jun;76(3):367-78 - PubMed
    1. J Hyg (Lond). 1975 Dec;75(3):445-74 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1974 Nov 9;2(7889):1131-3 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1974 Nov 9;2(7889):1133-6 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1965 Oct 2;2(7414):681-3 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources