Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Feb 27:16:25.
doi: 10.1186/s12903-016-0186-z.

Efficacy of virtual reality exposure therapy for treatment of dental phobia: a randomized control trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Efficacy of virtual reality exposure therapy for treatment of dental phobia: a randomized control trial

Kumar Raghav et al. BMC Oral Health. .

Abstract

Background: Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy (VRET) is found to be a promising and a viable alternative for in vivo exposure in the treatment of specific phobias. However, its usefulness for treating dental phobia is unexplored. The aims of the present study are to determine: (a) the efficacy of VRET versus informational pamphlet (IP) control group in terms of dental trait and state anxiety reductions at 1 week, 3 months and 6 months follow-up (b) the real-time physiological arousal [heart rate (HR)] of VRET group participants during and following therapy (c) the relation between subjective (presence) and objective (HR) measures during VRET.

Methods: This study is a single blind, randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms in which participants will be allocated to VRET or IP with a ratio of 1:1. Thirty participants (18-50 years) meeting the Phobia Checklist criteria of dental phobia will undergo block randomization with allocation concealment. The primary outcome measures include participants' dental trait anxiety (Modified Dental Anxiety Scale and Dental Fear Survey) and state anxiety (Visual Analogue Scale) measured at baseline (T0), at intervention (T1), 1-week (T2), 3 months (T3) and 6 months (T4) follow-up. A behavior test will be conducted before and after the intervention. The secondary outcome measures are real-time evaluation of HR and VR (Virtual Reality) experience (presence, realism, nausea) during and following the VRET intervention respectively. The data will be analyzed using intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis.

Discussion: This study uses novel non-invasive VRET, which may provide a possible alternative treatment for dental anxiety and phobia.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN25824611 , Date of registration: 26 October 2015.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participant flow and timing of evaluation

References

    1. Getka EJ, Glass CR. Behavioral and cognitive-behavioral approaches to the reduction of dental anxiety. Behav Ther. 1992;23(3):433–448. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80168-6. - DOI
    1. Milgrom PWP, Getz T. Treating Fearful Dental Patients: A Patient Management Handbook. 2. Seattle, Wash: University of Washington; 1995.
    1. De Jongh A, Schutjes M, Aartman IH. A test of Berggren's model of dental fear and anxiety. Eur J Oral Sci. 2011;119(5):361–365. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2011.00843.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moore R, Brodsgaard I, Abrahamsen R. A 3-year comparison of dental anxiety treatment outcomes: hypnosis, group therapy and individual desensitization vs. no specialist treatment. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002;110(4):287–295. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2002.21234.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Deacon BJ, Abramowitz JS. Cognitive and behavioral treatments for anxiety disorders: a review of meta-analytic findings. J Clin Psychol. 2004;60(4):429–441. doi: 10.1002/jclp.10255. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data