Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Mar:173:49-56.
doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.12.006. Epub 2015 Dec 17.

Revisiting age-predicted maximal heart rate: Can it be used as a valid measure of effort?

Ross Arena  1 , Jonathan Myers  2 , Leonard A Kaminsky  3
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Revisiting age-predicted maximal heart rate: Can it be used as a valid measure of effort?

Ross Arena et al. Am Heart J. 2016 Mar.

Abstract

Introduction: Despite high error ranges, age-predicted maximal heart rate (APMHR) is frequently used to gauge the achievement of adequate effort during an exercise test. The current analysis revisits this issue using the Fitness Registry and the Importance of Exercise: National Database (FRIEND Registry).

Methods: A total of 4,796 (63% male) apparently healthy subjects underwent a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test on a treadmill. The mean age, maximal heart rate (HR), and maximal aerobic capacity of the cohort were 43 ± 12 years, 178 ± 15 beats per minute, and 36.1 ± 10.6 mlO2 · kg(-1) · min(-1), respectively. All subjects reached or surpassed a peak respiratory exchange ratio of 1.10. A linear regression equation using age to predict maximal HR was validated in 3,796 subjects and cross-validated in the remaining 1,000 (randomly assigned).

Results: The APMHR equation in the validation cohort was as follows: 209.3 - 0.72(age). The r value and standard error of estimate for this regression was 0.61 (P < .001) and 11.35 beats/min, respectively. A 1-sample t test revealed that the mean difference between actual maximal HR and APMHR was not significantly different from 0 (mean difference = 0.32, P = .43). However, Bland-Altman revealed high limits of agreement (upper 25.31 and lower -24.67) and a significant proportional bias.

Discussion: The APMHR equation derived from this analysis included a large cohort of apparently healthy individuals with maximal exercise effort validated by the criterion standard (ie, peak respiratory exchange ratio). Using APMHR in this capacity should be discouraged, and new approaches to gauging an individual's exercise effort should be explored.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scatterplot line of best fit and 95% CIs for validation cohort.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scatterplot line of best fit and 95% CIs for cross-validation cohort.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Bland-Altman plot in the cross-validation cohort. Regression for calculation of APMHR used in Bland-Altman analysis: 209.3 – 0.72(age).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Arena R, Myers J, Guazzi M. The future of aerobic exercise testing in clinical practice: is it the ultimate vital sign? Futur Cardiol. 2010;6:325–42. - PubMed
    1. Balady GJ, Arena R, Sietsema K, et al. Clinician's guide to cardiopulmonary exercise testing in adults: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;122:191–225. - PubMed
    1. Fletcher GF, Ades PA, Kligfield P, et al. Exercise standards for testing and training: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;128:873–934. - PubMed
    1. Fox SM, III, Naughton JP, Haskell WL. Physical activity and the prevention of coronary heart disease. Ann Clin Res. 1971;3:404–32. - PubMed
    1. Bruce RA, Fisher LD, Cooper MN, et al. Separation of effects of cardiovascular disease and age on ventricular function with maximal exercise. Am J Cardiol. 1974;34:757–63. - PubMed

Publication types