Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Mar;21(3):333-42.
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0303. Epub 2016 Feb 26.

The Changing Landscape of Smoldering Multiple Myeloma: A European Perspective

Affiliations
Review

The Changing Landscape of Smoldering Multiple Myeloma: A European Perspective

Jo Caers et al. Oncologist. 2016 Mar.

Abstract

Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is an asymptomatic clonal plasma cell disorder and bridges monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance to multiple myeloma (MM), based on higher levels of circulating monoclonal immunoglobulin and bone marrow plasmocytosis without end-organ damage. Until a Spanish study reported fewer MM-related events and better overall survival among patients with high-risk SMM treated with lenalidomide and dexamethasone, prior studies had failed to show improved survival with earlier intervention, although a reduction in skeletal-related events (without any impact on disease progression) has been described with bisphosphonate use. Risk factors have now been defined, and a subset of ultra-high-risk patients have been reclassified by the International Myeloma Working Group as MM, and thus will require optimal MM treatment, based on biomarkers that identify patients with a >80% risk of progression. The number of these redefined patients is small (∼10%), but important to unravel, because their risk of progression to overt MM is substantial (≥80% within 2 years). Patients with a high-risk cytogenetic profile are not yet considered for early treatment, because groups are heterogeneous and risk factors other than cytogenetics are deemed to weight higher. Because patients with ultra-high-risk SMM are now considered as MM and may be treated as such, concerns exist that earlier therapy may increase the risk of selecting resistant clones and induce side effects and costs. Therefore, an even more accurate identification of patients who would benefit from interventions needs to be performed, and clinical judgment and careful discussion of pros and cons of treatment initiation need to be undertaken. For the majority of SMM patients, the standard of care remains observation until development of symptomatic MM occurs, encouraging participation in ongoing and upcoming SMM/early MM clinical trials, as well as consideration of bisphosphonate use in patients with early bone loss.

Keywords: Progression; Risk factors; Smoldering multiple myeloma; Treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Risk factors that identified ultra-high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM). (A): Risk of progression for SMM patients with bone marrow plasma cells >60% (adapted and reprinted with permission from [11]). (B): Risk of progression for SMM patients with a free light chain ratio ≥100 (adapted and reprinted with permission from [17]). (C): Incidence of progression in SMM patients according to the number of focal lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (adapted and reprinted with permission from [20]). Abbreviations: BM, bone marrow; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; sFLC, serum free light chain ratio.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Proposed algorithm for the management of smoldering multiple myeloma/multiple myeloma (MM) in 2015. Abbreviations: BM, bone marrow; BMPC, bone marrow plasma cell; CRAB, hypercalcemia, radiological bone lesions, anemia, and renal failure; M-protein, monoclonal protein level quantified by protein electrophoresis; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; sFLC, serum involved/uninvolved free light chain ratio.

References

    1. Engelhardt M, Terpos E, Kleber M, et al. European Myeloma Network recommendations on the evaluation and treatment of newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2014;99:232–242. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Röllig C, Knop S, Bornhäuser M. Multiple myeloma. Lancet. 2015;385:2197–2208. - PubMed
    1. Kyle RA, Greipp PR. Smoldering multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 1980;302:1347–1349. - PubMed
    1. International Myeloma Working Group Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: A report of the International Myeloma Working Group. Br J Haematol. 2003;121:749–757. - PubMed
    1. Caers J, Vekemans M-C, Bries G, et al. Diagnosis and follow-up of monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance; information for referring physicians. Ann Med. 2013;45:413–422. - PubMed

Publication types