Digital X-ray radiogrammetry in the study of osteoporotic fractures: Comparison to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and FRAX
- PMID: 26921822
- PMCID: PMC4833670
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2016.02.011
Digital X-ray radiogrammetry in the study of osteoporotic fractures: Comparison to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and FRAX
Abstract
Osteoporosis is often underdiagnosed and undertreated. Screening of post-menopausal women for clinical risk factors and/or low bone mineral density (BMD) has been proposed to overcome this. Digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR) estimates hand BMD from standard hand X-ray images and have shown to predict fractures and osteoporosis. Recently, digital radiology and the internet have opened up the possibility of conducting automated opportunistic screening with DXR in post-fracture care or in combination with mammography. This study compared the performance of DXR with FRAX® and DXA in discriminating major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) (hip, clinical spine, forearm or shoulder), hip fracture and femoral neck osteoporosis. This prospective cohort study was conducted on 5278 women 65years and older in the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) cohort. Baseline hand X-ray images were analyzed and fractures were ascertained during 10years of follow up. Age-adjusted area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for MOF and hip fracture and for femoral neck osteoporosis (DXA FN BMD T-score ≤-2.5) was used to compare the methods. Sensitivity to femoral neck osteoporosis at equal selection rates was tabulated for FRAX and DXR. DXR-BMD, FRAX (no BMD) and lumbar spine DXA BMD were all similar in fracture discriminative performance with an AUC around 0.65 for MOF and 0.70 for hip fractures for all three methods. As expected femoral neck DXA provided fracture discrimination superior both to other BMD measurements and to FRAX. AUC for selection of patients with femoral neck osteoporosis was higher with DXR-BMD, 0.76 (0.74-0.77), than with FRAX, 0.69 (0.67-0.71), (p<0.0001). In conclusion, DXR-BMD discriminates incident fractures to a similar degree as FRAX and predicts femoral neck osteoporosis to a larger degree than FRAX. DXR shows promise as a method to automatically flag individuals who might benefit from an osteoporosis assessment.
Keywords: Bone mineral density; Digital X-ray radiogrammetry; Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; FRAX; Osteoporosis.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Johan Kälvesten is an employee of Sectra AB, Linköping, Sweden. Li-Yung Lui, Torkel B. Brismar and Steven R. Cummings declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Fracture Risk Indices From DXA-Based Finite Element Analysis Predict Incident Fractures Independently From FRAX: The Manitoba BMD Registry.J Clin Densitom. 2019 Jul-Sep;22(3):338-345. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2019.02.001. Epub 2019 Feb 8. J Clin Densitom. 2019. PMID: 30852033
-
Spine bone texture assessed by trabecular bone score (TBS) predicts osteoporotic fractures in men: the Manitoba Bone Density Program.Bone. 2014 Oct;67:10-4. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.06.034. Epub 2014 Jul 2. Bone. 2014. PMID: 24998455
-
Digital X-ray radiogrammetry predicts hip, wrist and vertebral fracture risk in elderly women: a prospective analysis from the study of osteoporotic fractures.Osteoporos Int. 2002 May;13(5):358-65. doi: 10.1007/s001980200040. Osteoporos Int. 2002. PMID: 12086345
-
Use of Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) as a Complementary Approach to Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) for Fracture Risk Assessment in Clinical Practice.J Clin Densitom. 2017 Jul-Sep;20(3):334-345. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2017.06.019. Epub 2017 Jul 19. J Clin Densitom. 2017. PMID: 28734710 Review.
-
DXA-Based Measurements in Diabetes: Can They Predict Fracture Risk?Calcif Tissue Int. 2017 Feb;100(2):150-164. doi: 10.1007/s00223-016-0191-x. Epub 2016 Sep 3. Calcif Tissue Int. 2017. PMID: 27591864 Review.
Cited by
-
Improving Bone Mineral Density Screening by Using Digital X-Radiogrammetry Combined With Mammography.JBMR Plus. 2022 Mar 21;6(5):e10618. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10618. eCollection 2022 May. JBMR Plus. 2022. PMID: 35509633 Free PMC article.
-
A meta-analysis of the value of MRI-based VBQ scores for evaluating osteoporosis.Bone Rep. 2023 Aug 26;19:101711. doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2023.101711. eCollection 2023 Dec. Bone Rep. 2023. PMID: 37681002 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The 2nd Metacarpal Cortical Index as a Simple Screening Tool for Osteopenia.J Bone Metab. 2020 Nov;27(4):261-266. doi: 10.11005/jbm.2020.27.4.261. Epub 2020 Nov 30. J Bone Metab. 2020. PMID: 33317229 Free PMC article.
-
Selection of risk assessment methods for osteoporosis screening in postmenopausal women with low-energy fractures: A comparison of fracture risk assessment tool, digital X-ray radiogrammetry, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.SAGE Open Med. 2022 Jan 15;10:20503121211073421. doi: 10.1177/20503121211073421. eCollection 2022. SAGE Open Med. 2022. PMID: 35070314 Free PMC article.
-
Scaphoid Fractures in Adults Aged 50 Years or Older: Epidemiology and Association With Osteopenia and Nonunion.Hand (N Y). 2025 Sep;20(6):944-950. doi: 10.1177/15589447241235342. Epub 2024 Mar 20. Hand (N Y). 2025. PMID: 38506444 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hernlund E, Svedbom A, Ivergård M, et al. Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA) Arch Osteoporos. 2013;8(1–2):136. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Becker DJ, Yun H, Kilgore ML, et al. Health services utilization after fractures: evidence from Medicare. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2010 Sep;65(9):1012–20. - PubMed
-
- Zethraeus N, Borgström F, Ström O, Kanis JA, Jönsson B. Cost-effectiveness of the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis--a review of the literature and a reference model. Osteoporos Int. 2007 Jan;18(1):9–23. - PubMed
-
- Schousboe JT, Shepherd JA, Bilezikian JP, Baim S. Executive summary of the 2013 International Society for Clinical Densitometry Position Development Conference on bone densitometry. J Clin Densitom. 2013 Oct-Dec;16(4):455–66. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous