Influences of Radiology Trainees on Screening Mammography Interpretation
- PMID: 26924162
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.01.016
Influences of Radiology Trainees on Screening Mammography Interpretation
Abstract
Purpose: Participation of radiology trainees in screening mammographic interpretation is a critical component of radiology residency and fellowship training. The aim of this study was to investigate and quantify the effects of trainee involvement on screening mammographic interpretation and diagnostic outcomes.
Methods: Screening mammograms interpreted at an academic medical center by six dedicated breast imagers over a three-year period were identified, with cases interpreted by an attending radiologist alone or in conjunction with a trainee. Trainees included radiology residents, breast imaging fellows, and fellows from other radiology subspecialties during breast imaging rotations. Trainee participation, patient variables, results of diagnostic evaluations, and pathology were recorded.
Results: A total of 47,914 mammograms from 34,867 patients were included, with an overall recall rate for attending radiologists reading alone of 14.7% compared with 18.0% when involving a trainee (P < .0001). Overall cancer detection rate for attending radiologists reading alone was 5.7 per 1,000 compared with 5.2 per 1,000 when reading with a trainee (P = .517). When reading with a trainee, dense breasts represented a greater portion of recalls (P = .0001), and more frequently, greater than one abnormality was described in the breast (P = .013). Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ versus invasive carcinoma or invasive cancer type was not significantly different. The mean size of cancers in patients recalled by attending radiologists alone was smaller, and nodal involvement was less frequent, though not statistically significantly.
Conclusions: These results demonstrate a significant overall increase in recall rate when interpreting screening mammograms with radiology trainees, with no change in cancer detection rate. Radiology faculty members should be aware of this potentiality and mitigate tendencies toward greater false positives.
Keywords: Screening mammography; breast radiologist; medical education; radiology education; radiology trainees.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Does Breast Imaging Experience During Residency Translate Into Improved Initial Performance in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis?J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Jul;12(7):728-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.02.025. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015. PMID: 26143567
-
Using computer-extracted image features for modeling of error-making patterns in detection of mammographic masses among radiology residents.Med Phys. 2014 Sep;41(9):091907. doi: 10.1118/1.4892173. Med Phys. 2014. PMID: 25186394
-
Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists.Radiology. 2002 Sep;224(3):861-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2243011482. Radiology. 2002. PMID: 12202726
-
Radiologists' interpretive efficiency and variability in true- and false-positive detection when screen-reading with tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) relative to standard mammography in population screening.Breast. 2015 Dec;24(6):687-93. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.08.012. Epub 2015 Oct 1. Breast. 2015. PMID: 26433751 Review.
-
Radiology Trainee vs Faculty Radiologist Fluoroscopy Time for Imaging-Guided Procedures: A Retrospective Study of 17,966 Reports Over a 5.5-Year Period.Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2018 Jul-Aug;47(4):233-237. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 8. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2018. PMID: 28797716 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Reader characteristics and mammogram features associated with breast imaging reporting scores.Br J Radiol. 2020 Oct 1;93(1114):20200363. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20200363. Epub 2020 Aug 5. Br J Radiol. 2020. PMID: 32730088 Free PMC article.
-
The Accuracy and Reliability of Crowdsource Annotations of Digital Retinal Images.Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016 Sep 21;5(5):6. doi: 10.1167/tvst.5.5.6. eCollection 2016 Sep. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016. PMID: 27668130 Free PMC article.
-
Breast Cancer Diagnostic Efficacy in a Developing South-East Asian Country.Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Mar 26;20(3):727-731. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.3.727. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019. PMID: 30909671 Free PMC article.
-
Classification of Microcalcification Clusters in Digital Mammograms Using a Stack Generalization Based Classifier.J Imaging. 2019 Sep 12;5(9):76. doi: 10.3390/jimaging5090076. J Imaging. 2019. PMID: 34460670 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical