Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan;48(1):131-149.
doi: 10.1177/0013916515607311. Epub 2015 Sep 28.

Which worksite supports for healthy weight do employees use?

Rachel G Tabak  1 , J Aaron Hipp  2 , Christine M Marx  3 , Lin Yang  3 , Ross C Brownson  4
Affiliations

Which worksite supports for healthy weight do employees use?

Rachel G Tabak et al. Environ Behav. 2016 Jan.

Abstract

This paper explores factors associated with employee use of available supports for improving nutrition and activity behaviors. A cross-sectional telephone-survey assessed presence and use of available program, facility, and policy supports. Logistic regression was used to explore associations between job characteristics (e.g., supervising others) and use of available supports, adjusting for demographic characteristics. After adjustment, most supports were associated with at least one job-related factor. Participants supervising others were more likely to utilize eight supports including personal services for fitness, indoor exercise and shower facilities, and flextime for physical activity. The programs and facilities associated with the most factors were health fairs (e.g., increased likelihood with increased hours worked/week) and indoor exercise and shower facilities (e.g., increased likelihood with increased flexibility at work), respectively. Policies were associated with fewer factors. Since use of many programs and facilities differed based on job-related factors, employers might target supports based on job-related factors.

Keywords: Nutrition; Obesity prevention; Physical activity; Workplace environment and policies; Workplace health promotion.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Anderson LM, Quinn TA, Glanz K, Ramirez G, Kahwati LC, Johnson DB, Task Force on Community Preventive, S The effectiveness of worksite nutrition and physical activity interventions for controlling employee overweight and obesity: a systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2009;37(4):340–357. doi: S0749-3797(09)00486-3 [pii] 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.07.003. - PubMed
    1. Baicker K, Cutler D, Song Z. Workplace wellness programs can generate savings. Health Affairs. 2010;29(2):304–311. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0626 hlthaff.2009.0626 [pii] - PubMed
    1. Baxter S, Sanderson K, Venn AJ, Blizzard CL, Palmer AJ. The relationship between return on investment and quality of study methodology in workplace health promotion programs. American Journal of Health Promotion. 2014;28(6):347–363. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.130731-LIT-395. - PubMed
    1. Biener L, Glanz K, McLerran D, Sorensen G, Thompson B, Basen-Engquis t. K., Varnes J. Impact of the Working Well Trial on the worksite smoking and nutrition environment. Health Education Behavior. 1999;26(4):478–494. - PubMed
    1. Bray GA. Overweight is risking fate. Definition, classification, prevalence, and risks. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1987;499:14–28. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources