Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec 1;2(4):256-261.
doi: 10.1007/s40473-015-0058-x. Epub 2015 Oct 16.

What is Normal Cognitive Aging? Evidence from Task-Based Functional Neuroimaging

Affiliations

What is Normal Cognitive Aging? Evidence from Task-Based Functional Neuroimaging

Julie A Dumas. Curr Behav Neurosci Rep. .

Abstract

The idea that our cognitive abilities change with age has support from empirical research as well as from anecdotal reports. Cognition has many component processes, some of which are impaired by normal aging like attention and memory as a result of changes in perceptual systems or speed of processing. Other cognitive domains improve in functioning as aging continues such as wisdom and some kinds of decision making. Many years of research in the psychology of cognitive aging has described patterns of age-related changes in cognitive processes with older adults performing worse than younger adults on tests of attention, working memory and episodic memory and better on tests of general knowledge. More recent work in task-related functional neuroimaging has further elucidated the effects of aging on brain circuitry related to these cognitive processes. Generally, studies show that older adults activate regions of the frontal cortex more than younger adults while younger adults activate more posterior cortical areas. This paper describes normal patterns of cognitive change in healthy aging, describes how some of these processes can be explored with functional neuroimaging, and briefly describes the work attempting to describe differences between normal and pathological cognitive aging.

Keywords: attention; cognitive abilities; cognitive aging; cognitive disorders; episodic memory; fMRI; geropsychiatry; late life; pathological cognitive aging; working memory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

Julie A Dumas has no relevant conflicts to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Model of Cognition and Aging
Figure 1 diagrams a model of age-related changes in cognition based on the model of Cowan, and includes patterns of brain activation as measured by fMRI. Dotted and grayed lines indicate impairments. When younger adults (left panel) perform attention and memory tests they show brain activation patterns that are balanced between occipital and frontal regions or even have a shift towards greater posterior activation. Normal cognitive aging (middle panel) may degrade the control processes of the focus of attention (FOA) thereby affecting working memory and long-term memory. The functional activation patterns show increased in frontal activation relative to posterior regions. Lifestyle modifications may be effective in slowing or reversing some of the aspects of cognitive aging. Cognitive dysfunction seen in pathological cognitive aging may affect all aspects of cognition. The activation patterns will show decreases in frontal and occipital regions.

References

    1. Blazer DG, Yaffe K, Karlawish J. Cognitive aging: a report from the Institute of Medicine. Jama. 2015;313:2121–2. - PubMed
    1. Verhaeghen P, Marcoen A, Goossens L. Facts and fiction about memory aging: a quantitative integration of research findings. Journal of Gerontology. 1993;48:157–71. - PubMed
    1. Verhaeghen P, Cerella J. Aging, executive control, and attention: a review of meta-analyses. Neuroscience Biobehavioral Reviews. 2002;26:849–57. - PubMed
    1. Craik FI, Salthouse T. Handbook of Aging and Cogntion II. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2000.
    1. Cowan N. Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information processing system. Psychological Bulletin. 1988;104:163–91. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources