Comparative Analysis of Calcium Silicate-based Root Filling Materials Using an Open Apex Model
- PMID: 26925519
- DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.01.015
Comparative Analysis of Calcium Silicate-based Root Filling Materials Using an Open Apex Model
Abstract
Introduction: Many new calcium silicate-based root filling materials have emerged in the market; however, their performance in the orthograde obturation of an open apex has not been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to compare the marginal adaptation of ProRoot MTA (Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK), NeoMTA Plus (Avalon Biomed Inc, Bradenton, FL), and Endosequence BC RRM-Fast Set Putty (BC RRM-FS; Brasseler USA, Savannah, GA) after orthograde placement in roots with open apices.
Methods: Palatal roots of maxillary molars were instrumented to create divergent open apices and divided into 4 groups for orthograde obturation: ProRoot MTA, NeoMTA Plus, BC RRM-FS, and BC RRM-FS + BC Sealer. Using a scanning electron microscope, the quality of material adaptation at the anatomic apex was evaluated by 5 blinded examiners; 3 mm of the root end was sectioned, and gap distance was measured at the material-dentin interface. Statistical analyses were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test.
Results: There were no significant differences in marginal adaptation among the 4 groups at the level of the anatomic apex (P = .175). BC RRM-FS + BC Sealer had a significantly smaller gap size after 3-mm root end resection compared with the other 3 groups (P < .01). No differences were observed among the other 3 materials.
Conclusions: All materials showed comparable marginal adaptation at the anatomic apex when used for orthograde obturation of open apices. Application of BC Sealer before the delivery of BC RRM-FS Putty enhanced the quality of adaptation coronal to the apex.
Keywords: Apexification; calcium silicate materials; mineral trioxide aggregate; obturation; open apex.
Copyright © 2016 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Tricalcium Silicate Sealers.J Endod. 2016 Apr;42(4):632-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.12.012. Epub 2016 Feb 19. J Endod. 2016. PMID: 26898564 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Mechanical and Indirect Ultrasonic Placement Technique on Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Retrofill Density in Simulated Root-end Surgery.J Endod. 2016 Apr;42(4):650-3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Feb 18. J Endod. 2016. PMID: 26898561
-
Comparative in vitro study of the sealing efficiency of white vs grey ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate formulas as apical barriers.Dent Traumatol. 2008 Apr;24(2):207-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2007.00516.x. Dent Traumatol. 2008. PMID: 18352926
-
The use of mineral trioxide aggregate in clinical and surgical endodontics.Dent Today. 2003 Mar;22(3):74-81. Dent Today. 2003. PMID: 12705015 Review. No abstract available.
-
Multifaceted use of ProRoot MTA root canal repair material.Pediatr Dent. 2001 Jul-Aug;23(4):326-30. Pediatr Dent. 2001. PMID: 11572491 Review.
Cited by
-
Bone tissue reaction, setting time, solubility, and pH of root repair materials.Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Mar;23(3):1359-1366. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2564-1. Epub 2018 Jul 18. Clin Oral Investig. 2019. PMID: 30022271
-
In vitro comparison of apical microleakage by spectrophotometry in simulated apexification using White Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, TotalFill Bioceramic Root Repair material, and BioDentine.J Conserv Dent. 2019 May-Jun;22(3):237-240. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_19_19. J Conserv Dent. 2019. PMID: 31367105 Free PMC article.
-
The Washout Resistance of Bioactive Root-End Filling Materials.Materials (Basel). 2023 Aug 23;16(17):5757. doi: 10.3390/ma16175757. Materials (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37687450 Free PMC article.
-
Push-out bond strength and marginal adaptation of apical plugs with bioactive endodontic cements in simulated immature teeth.Restor Dent Endod. 2021 Oct 20;46(4):e53. doi: 10.5395/rde.2021.46.e53. eCollection 2021 Nov. Restor Dent Endod. 2021. PMID: 34909417 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of three different biomaterials used in in vitro molar apexification models.BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jun 30;23(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03180-y. BMC Oral Health. 2023. PMID: 37391750 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous