Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov 15;5(3):173-81.
doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.199.

Decentralisation of Health Services in Fiji: A Decision Space Analysis

Jalal Mohammed  1 , Nicola North  1 , Toni Ashton  1
Affiliations

Decentralisation of Health Services in Fiji: A Decision Space Analysis

Jalal Mohammed et al. Int J Health Policy Manag. .

Abstract

Background: Decentralisation aims to bring services closer to the community and has been advocated in the health sector to improve quality, access and equity, and to empower local agencies, increase innovation and efficiency and bring healthcare and decision-making as close as possible to where people live and work. Fiji has attempted two approaches to decentralisation. The current approach reflects a model of deconcentration of outpatient services from the tertiary level hospital to the peripheral health centres in the Suva subdivision.

Methods: Using a modified decision space approach developed by Bossert, this study measures decision space created in five broad categories (finance, service organisation, human resources, access rules, and governance rules) within the decentralised services.

Results: Fiji's centrally managed historical-based allocation of financial resources and management of human resources resulted in no decision space for decentralised agents. Narrow decision space was created in the service organisation category where, with limited decision space created over access rules, Fiji has seen greater usage of its decentralised health centres. There remains limited decision space in governance.

Conclusion: The current wave of decentralisation reveals that, whilst the workload has shifted from the tertiary hospital to the peripheral health centres, it has been accompanied by limited transfer of administrative authority, suggesting that Fiji's deconcentration reflects the transfer of workload only with decision-making in the five functional areas remaining largely centralised. As such, the benefits of decentralisation for users and providers are likely to be limited.

Keywords: Access to Healthcare; Decentralisation; Decision Space; Fiji; Health Reform; Principal Agent Approach.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Mills A, Vaughan JP, Smith DL, Tabibzadeh I. Health System Decentralization: Concepts, Issues and Country Experience. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 1990.
    1. Rondinelli D. Government decentralization in comparative perspective: theory and practice in developing countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences. 1980;47(2):133–145. doi: 10.1177/002085238004700205. - DOI
    1. Sen K, Koivusalo M. Health care reforms and developing countries - a criticial overview. Int J Health Plan Dev. 1998;( 13 ):199– 215 . doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1751(1998070)13:3%3C199::aid-hpm518%3E3.3.co;2-t. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bossert T. Analyzing the decentralization of health systems in developing countries: decision space, innovation and performance. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47( 10 ):1513– 1527 . doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00234-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization (WHO). Declaration of Alma-Ata, 1978. Geneva: WHO; 2005.

LinkOut - more resources