Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar 1:3:160006.
doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.6.

Female and male life tables for seven wild primate species

Affiliations

Female and male life tables for seven wild primate species

Anne M Bronikowski et al. Sci Data. .

Abstract

We provide male and female census count data, age-specific survivorship, and female age-specific fertility estimates for populations of seven wild primates that have been continuously monitored for at least 29 years: sifaka (Propithecus verreauxi) in Madagascar; muriqui (Brachyteles hypoxanthus) in Brazil; capuchin (Cebus capucinus) in Costa Rica; baboon (Papio cynocephalus) and blue monkey (Cercopithecus mitis) in Kenya; chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) in Tanzania; and gorilla (Gorilla beringei) in Rwanda. Using one-year age-class intervals, we computed point estimates of age-specific survival for both sexes. In all species, our survival estimates for the dispersing sex are affected by heavy censoring. We also calculated reproductive value, life expectancy, and mortality hazards for females. We used bootstrapping to place confidence intervals on life-table summary metrics (R0, the net reproductive rate; λ, the population growth rate; and G, the generation time). These data have high potential for reuse; they derive from continuous population monitoring of long-lived organisms and will be invaluable for addressing questions about comparative demography, primate conservation and human evolution.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Sex ratio (proportion female) for individuals born into each study population whose sex was determined before they died.
The total number of sexed offspring is shown at the top of each bar. Error bars show the 95% binomial confidence intervals for the proportion female, and overlap 0.5 (dashed line) for all species. We thus justify the 50:50 sex ratio we assumed when estimating fertilities.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Age-specific probability of producing a son (blue) versus a daughter (red).
Plotted values are the weighted number of sons or daughters divided by the weighted number of mothers (Nm.x in Table 2A in Data Citation 1). Numbers at the top of each panel give the (unweighted) number of mothers in each age interval. There is no striking evidence that offspring sex ratio varies with the age of the mother. These estimates necessarily ignore offspring that died before their sex could be determined, which are not ignored in the estimates of m.x in Table 2A in Data Citation 1.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Age-specific survival (lx), fertility (mx), and reproductive values (vx) for seven species of primate.
Reproductive value is set to 1 at birth, increases steadily until age of first reproduction, and then declines steadily until the end of life for all species.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Distribution of female age (yr) of first reproduction.
In this box-and-whiskers plot, red lines show the median, blue boxes show the interquartile range, whiskers extend to the most extreme data point which is ≤1.5 times the interquartile range from the box, and red plus symbols indicate more extreme data points. Species are ordered from lowest to highest age at first reproduction. Age was estimated for females present at the onset of a study and for those who immigrated into a study group, which may have introduced error into these estimates of age at first reproduction.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Female Life expectancy at age x (ex) versus x (in years).

Dataset use reported in

  • doi: 10.1126/science.1201571
  • doi: 10.1073/pnas.1311857110
  • doi: 10.1086/657443

References

Data Citations

    1. Bronikowski A. M. 2015. Dryad Digital Repository. http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.v28t5 - DOI

References

    1. Deevey E. S. Life Tables for Natural Populations of Animals. Q. Rev. Biol. 22, 283–314 (1947). - PubMed
    1. Strier K. B. et al. The Primate Life History Database: A unique shared ecological data resource. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 1, 199–211 (2010). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bronikowski A. M. et al. Aging in the Natural World: Comparative Data Reveal Similar Mortality Patterns Across Primates. Science 331, 1325–1328 (2011). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alberts S. C. et al. Reproductive aging patterns in primates reveal that humans are distinct. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 13440–13445 (2013). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morris W. F. et al. Low Demographic Variability in Wild Primate Populations: Fitness Impacts of Variation, Covariation, and Serial Correlation in Vital Rates. Am. Nat. 177, E14–E28 (2011). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types