Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Mar;214(3):361.e1-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.042.

Randomized controlled trial of prolonged second stage: extending the time limit vs usual guidelines

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomized controlled trial of prolonged second stage: extending the time limit vs usual guidelines

Alexis C Gimovsky et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Guidelines for management of the second stage have been proposed since the 1800s and were created largely by expert opinion. Current retrospective data are mixed regarding differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes with a prolonged second stage. There are no randomized controlled trials that have evaluated whether extending the second stage of labor beyond current American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommendations is beneficial.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether extending the length of labor in nulliparous women with prolonged second stage affects the incidence of cesarean delivery and maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Study design: We conducted a randomized controlled trial of nulliparous women with singleton gestations at 36 0/7 to 41 6/7 weeks gestation who reached the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists definition of prolonged second stage of labor, which is 3 hours with epidural anesthesia or 2 hours without epidural anesthesia. Women were assigned randomly to extended labor for at least 1 additional hour, or to usual labor, which was defined as expedited delivery via cesarean or operative vaginal delivery. The exclusion criteria were intrauterine fetal death, planned cesarean delivery, age <18 years, and suspected major fetal anomaly. Primary outcome was incidence of cesarean delivery. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared secondarily. Statistical analysis was done by intention-to-treat.

Results: Seventy-eight nulliparous women were assigned randomly. All of the women had epidural anesthesia. Maternal demographics were not significantly different. The incidence of cesarean delivery was 19.5% (n = 8/41 deliveries) in the extended labor group and 43.2% (n = 16/37 deliveries) in the usual labor group (relative risk, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.93). The number needed-to-treat to prevent 1 cesarean delivery was 4.2. There were no statistically significant differences in maternal or neonatal morbidity outcomes.

Conclusion: Extending the length of labor in nulliparous women with singleton gestations, epidural anesthesia, and prolonged second stage decreased the incidence of cesarean delivery by slightly more than one-half, compared with usual guidelines. Maternal or neonatal morbidity were not statistically different between the groups; however, our study was underpowered to detect small, but potentially clinical important, differences.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02101515.

Keywords: cesarean delivery; labor; prolonged second stage; randomized controlled trial; second stage of labor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Too close for comfort.
    Leveno KJ, McIntire DD, Nelson DB. Leveno KJ, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;215(3):399-400. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.055. Epub 2016 May 9. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 27173079 No abstract available.
  • Reply.
    Gimovsky AC, Berghella V. Gimovsky AC, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;215(3):400. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.057. Epub 2016 May 10. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 27173080 No abstract available.
  • Reply.
    Gimovsky AC, Berghella V. Gimovsky AC, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;215(4):535-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.05.042. Epub 2016 Jun 1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 27262973 No abstract available.
  • Randomized controlled trial of prolonged second stage: extending the time limit vs usual guidelines.
    Jovanovski AP. Jovanovski AP. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;215(4):535. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.05.043. Epub 2016 Jun 2. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 27262974 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

Associated data