One size should not fit all, so use the right tool for the job
- PMID: 26929136
- PMCID: PMC7220028
- DOI: 10.1111/add.13283
One size should not fit all, so use the right tool for the job
Abstract
The 4/5+ criterion for heavy drinking has limited validity as an index of treatment efficacy, and use of continuous and multi-dimensional measures of outcome are recommended. The 4/5+ criterion continues to be a useful indicator of alcohol-related risk for screening and prevention.
Keywords: 4+/5+ criterion; alcohol treatment; binge drinking; health intervention; heavy drinking; outcome measure; screening.
Comment in
-
We still question the utility and validity of the binge/heavy drinking criterion.Addiction. 2016 Oct;111(10):1733-4. doi: 10.1111/add.13384. Epub 2016 May 3. Addiction. 2016. PMID: 27137172 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Questioning the validity of the 4+/5+ binge or heavy drinking criterion in college and clinical populations.Addiction. 2016 Oct;111(10):1720-6. doi: 10.1111/add.13210. Epub 2015 Dec 28. Addiction. 2016. PMID: 27605077 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Marlatt GA, Witkiewitz K. Harm reduction approaches to alcohol use: Health promotion, prevention, and treatment. Addictive Behaviors. 2002;27(6):867–86. - PubMed
-
- Babor TF, Longabaugh R, Zweben A, Fuller RK, Stout RL, Anton RF, et al. Issues in the definition and measurement of drinking outcomes in alcoholism treatment research. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 1994;Suppl 12:101–11. - PubMed
-
- McLellan AT, Cacciola JC, Alterman AI, Rikoon SH, Carise D. The Addiction Severity Index at 25: Origins, contributions, and transitions. American Journal on Addictions. 2006;15(2):113–24. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
