A Comparative Study Between Bupivacaine with Adrenaline and Carbonated Bupivacaine with Adrenaline for Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar
- PMID: 26929560
- PMCID: PMC4759020
- DOI: 10.1007/s12663-015-0791-4
A Comparative Study Between Bupivacaine with Adrenaline and Carbonated Bupivacaine with Adrenaline for Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of bupivacaine with adrenaline with that of carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline on pain, onset of anesthesia and duration of anesthesia following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar.
Study design: All the patients who underwent surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar and who fulfilled our inclusion and exclusion criteria from 1st June 2013 to 30th June 2014 were included in our study. Patients who were diagnosed as having impacted mandibular third molar were randomly allocated to two groups namely group A (bupivacaine with adrenaline), group B (carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline). Pain during deposition of local anesthetic, onset of anesthesia and duration of anesthesia were compared between the two groups. The collected data were subjected to statistical analysis by Chi Square test, Mann-Whitney U test.
Results and conclusion: The efficacy of carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline is more compared with bupivacaine with adrenaline in decreasing pain on deposition of local anesthetic solution and in rapid onset of anesthesia. The duration of anesthesia for carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline and bupivacaine with adrenaline had no significant difference. The use of carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline will reduce the patient discomfort both intra-operatively and post-operatively.
Keywords: Alkalinisation; Bupicaine; Impacted third molar.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of efficacy of lignocaine, ropivacaine, and bupivacaine in pain control during extraction of mandibular posterior teeth.Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2021 May-Aug;12(2):238-243. doi: 10.4103/njms.NJMS_14_20. Epub 2021 Jul 15. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2021. PMID: 34483583 Free PMC article.
-
Anesthetic and analgesic efficacy of bupivacaine in mandibular third molar surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Quintessence Int. 2020;51(7):586-597. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a44633. Quintessence Int. 2020. PMID: 32500866
-
Comparison of latency and efficacy of twin mix and modified twin mix in impacted mandibular third molar surgery - A Preliminary Randomized Triple Blind Split Mouth Clinical Study.J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Jun;121(3):248-253. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2019.07.011. Epub 2019 Jul 20. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020. PMID: 31336212 Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluation of Anesthetic Efficacy of 4% Articaine, 0.5% Bupivacaine and 0.5% Ropivacaine During Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Randomized Comparative Clinical Study.J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2024 Jun;23(3):538-544. doi: 10.1007/s12663-021-01548-7. Epub 2021 Apr 11. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2024. PMID: 38911429 Free PMC article.
-
Bupivacaine versus lignocaine as the choice of locall anesthetic agent for impacted third molar surgery a review.J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015 Apr;7(Suppl 1):S230-3. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.155921. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015. PMID: 26015720 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A Comparative Study to Evaluate the Anesthetic Efficacy of Buffered Versus Non-buffered 2% Lidocaine During Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block.Cureus. 2022 Nov 24;14(11):e31855. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31855. eCollection 2022 Nov. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36582560 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative study of analgesia with bupivacaine 0.25% versus 0.5% for third molar removal under general anesthesia.J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Jun;16(2):117-122. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2016.16.2.117. Epub 2016 Jun 30. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2016. PMID: 28879304 Free PMC article.
-
Adjuvant Drugs for Peripheral Nerve Blocks: The Role of NMDA Antagonists, Neostigmine, Epinephrine, and Sodium Bicarbonate.Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Jul 5;11(3):e117146. doi: 10.5812/aapm.117146. eCollection 2021 Jun. Anesth Pain Med. 2021. PMID: 34540646 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Buffered 2% articaine versus non-buffered 4% articaine in maxillary infiltration: randomized clinical trial.Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Jun;25(6):3527-3533. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03674-x. Epub 2020 Nov 5. Clin Oral Investig. 2021. PMID: 33151422 Clinical Trial.
-
Effectiveness of anesthetic solutions for pain control in lower third molar extraction surgeries: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials with network meta-analysis.Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Jan;25(1):1-22. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03675-w. Epub 2020 Nov 8. Clin Oral Investig. 2021. PMID: 33161499
References
-
- Obiechina AE, Arotiba Fasola AO. Third molar impaction: evaluation of the symptoms and pattern of impaction of mandibular third molar teeth in Nigerians. Odontostomatol Trop. 2001;24(93):22–25. - PubMed
-
- Malamed SF (2004) Handbook of local anaesthesia, 5th ed. Elsevier, St. Louis
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources