Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar 1;11(3):e0149778.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149778. eCollection 2016.

D-BRAIN: Anatomically Accurate Simulated Diffusion MRI Brain Data

Affiliations

D-BRAIN: Anatomically Accurate Simulated Diffusion MRI Brain Data

Daniele Perrone et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Diffusion Weighted (DW) MRI allows for the non-invasive study of water diffusion inside living tissues. As such, it is useful for the investigation of human brain white matter (WM) connectivity in vivo through fiber tractography (FT) algorithms. Many DW-MRI tailored restoration techniques and FT algorithms have been developed. However, it is not clear how accurately these methods reproduce the WM bundle characteristics in real-world conditions, such as in the presence of noise, partial volume effect, and a limited spatial and angular resolution. The difficulty lies in the lack of a realistic brain phantom on the one hand, and a sufficiently accurate way of modeling the acquisition-related degradation on the other. This paper proposes a software phantom that approximates a human brain to a high degree of realism and that can incorporate complex brain-like structural features. We refer to it as a Diffusion BRAIN (D-BRAIN) phantom. Also, we propose an accurate model of a (DW) MRI acquisition protocol to allow for validation of methods in realistic conditions with data imperfections. The phantom model simulates anatomical and diffusion properties for multiple brain tissue components, and can serve as a ground-truth to evaluate FT algorithms, among others. The simulation of the acquisition process allows one to include noise, partial volume effects, and limited spatial and angular resolution in the images. In this way, the effect of image artifacts on, for instance, fiber tractography can be investigated with great detail. The proposed framework enables reliable and quantitative evaluation of DW-MR image processing and FT algorithms at the level of large-scale WM structures. The effect of noise levels and other data characteristics on cortico-cortical connectivity and tractography-based grey matter parcellation can be investigated as well.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Brain like phantom creation.
Proposed pipeline: from realistic inputs and a simulated DW MRI scanner to brain-like D-BRAIN data. The tissue volume fractions have a resolution of 0.7 × 0.7 × 0.7 mm3, streamlines step-size is 0.7 mm.
Fig 2
Fig 2. D-BRAIN.
Anatomical MR image (a) and corresponding diffusion-weighted images for D-BRAIN data. B-values of 1000 s mm−2 (b), 2500 s mm−2 (c) and 10000 s mm−2 (d). For each picture, the intensity values have been optimized for visual purposes.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Phantom WM bundles tractography.
A portion of the corticospinal tract (a), pathways of the forceps minor (b), tracts following the cingulum (c), streamlines belonging to the fornix (d), and part of the uncinate fasciculus (e).
Fig 4
Fig 4. Phantom WM bundles tractography.
The upper portion of the corticospinal tract (a) has a lower FA in the region highlighted because of the contribution of other fibers coming from the body of the corpus callosum. In (b), the crossing of the corticospinal tracts (blue) and the lateral projections of the corpus callosum (red) are clearly visible.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Estimated phantom fODF for different SNR.
Yellow boxes highlight the effect of noise level. Top left: ROI. ROI magnification for: SNR = 30 (a), SNR = 20 (b), and SNR = 15 (c). B-value = 1000 s mm2.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Estimated phantom fODF for different resolutions.
Top left: ROI. ROI magnification for: voxel size = 1.4 × 1.4 × 1.4 mm3 (a), voxel size = 2.1 × 2.1 × 2.1 mm3 (b). SNR = inf.
Fig 7
Fig 7. D-BRAIN FA maps before and after k-space downsampling.
Voxel size is 0.7 × 0.7 × 0.7 mm3 (a), 1.4 × 1.4 × 1.4 mm3 (b) and 2.1 × 2.1 × 2.1 mm3 (c). Yellow arrows highlight the Gibbs ringing artifact.
Fig 8
Fig 8. Estimated phantom fODF for different b-values.
Yellow boxes highlight the effect of the b-value. Top left: ROI. ROI magnification for: b-value = 1000 s mm2 (a), b-value = 2500 s mm2 (b), b-value = 10000 s mm2 (c). SNR = inf.
Fig 9
Fig 9. Connectivity analysis.
The 82 GM parcels used as network nodes (a) superimposed to the FA map. In (b), the corresponding connectivity matrix built counting the number of streamlines connecting each couple of parcels (intensities displayed in logarithmic scale).
Fig 10
Fig 10. Estimated network connectivity measures.
Variability across different SNR and resolutions of D-BRAIN data. Ground truth: from noiseless data whose voxel size is 1.4 × 1.4 × 1.4 mm3. High Resolution: from noisy data whose voxel size is 1.4 × 1.4 × 1.4 mm3. Low Resolution: from noisy data whose voxel size is 2.1 × 2.1 × 2.1 mm3.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • A 3D model-based simulation of demyelination to understand its effects on diffusion tensor imaging.
    Salan T, Jacobs EL, Reddick WE. Salan T, et al. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2017 Jul;2017:3525-3528. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2017.8037617. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2017. PMID: 29060658 Free PMC article.
  • What's new and what's next in diffusion MRI preprocessing.
    Tax CMW, Bastiani M, Veraart J, Garyfallidis E, Okan Irfanoglu M. Tax CMW, et al. Neuroimage. 2022 Apr 1;249:118830. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118830. Epub 2021 Dec 26. Neuroimage. 2022. PMID: 34965454 Free PMC article. Review.
  • The challenge of mapping the human connectome based on diffusion tractography.
    Maier-Hein KH, Neher PF, Houde JC, Côté MA, Garyfallidis E, Zhong J, Chamberland M, Yeh FC, Lin YC, Ji Q, Reddick WE, Glass JO, Chen DQ, Feng Y, Gao C, Wu Y, Ma J, He R, Li Q, Westin CF, Deslauriers-Gauthier S, González JOO, Paquette M, St-Jean S, Girard G, Rheault F, Sidhu J, Tax CMW, Guo F, Mesri HY, Dávid S, Froeling M, Heemskerk AM, Leemans A, Boré A, Pinsard B, Bedetti C, Desrosiers M, Brambati S, Doyon J, Sarica A, Vasta R, Cerasa A, Quattrone A, Yeatman J, Khan AR, Hodges W, Alexander S, Romascano D, Barakovic M, Auría A, Esteban O, Lemkaddem A, Thiran JP, Cetingul HE, Odry BL, Mailhe B, Nadar MS, Pizzagalli F, Prasad G, Villalon-Reina JE, Galvis J, Thompson PM, Requejo FS, Laguna PL, Lacerda LM, Barrett R, Dell'Acqua F, Catani M, Petit L, Caruyer E, Daducci A, Dyrby TB, Holland-Letz T, Hilgetag CC, Stieltjes B, Descoteaux M. Maier-Hein KH, et al. Nat Commun. 2017 Nov 7;8(1):1349. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01285-x. Nat Commun. 2017. PMID: 29116093 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Le Bihan D, Breton E. Imagerie de diffusion in-vivo par resonance. Cr Acad Sci. 1985;301:1109–1112.
    1. Gallichan D, Scholz J, Bartsch A, Behrens TE, Robson MD, Miller KL. Addressing a systematic vibration artifact in diffusion-weighted MRI. Hum Brain Mapp. 2010;31(2):193–202. - PMC - PubMed
    1. den Dekker AJ, Sijbers J. Data distributions in magnetic resonance images: A review. Phys Med. 2014;30:725–741. 10.1016/j.ejmp.2014.05.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vos SB, Jones DK, Viergever MA, Leemans A. Partial volume effect as a hidden covariate in DTI analyses. NeuroImage. 2011;55(4):1566–76. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.048 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jeurissen B, Leemans A, Tournier JD, Jones DK, Sijbers J. Investigating the prevalence of complex fiber configurations in white matter tissue with diffusion magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Brain Mapp. 2013;34(11):2747–66. 10.1002/hbm.22099 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms