Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2015;6(4):183-205.
doi: 10.1080/21645698.2015.1129937.

Genome editing for crop improvement: Challenges and opportunities

Affiliations
Editorial

Genome editing for crop improvement: Challenges and opportunities

Naglaa A Abdallah et al. GM Crops Food. 2015.

Abstract

Genome or gene editing includes several new techniques to help scientists precisely modify genome sequences. The techniques also enables us to alter the regulation of gene expression patterns in a pre-determined region and facilitates novel insights into the functional genomics of an organism. Emergence of genome editing has brought considerable excitement especially among agricultural scientists because of its simplicity, precision and power as it offers new opportunities to develop improved crop varieties with clear-cut addition of valuable traits or removal of undesirable traits. Research is underway to improve crop varieties with higher yields, strengthen stress tolerance, disease and pest resistance, decrease input costs, and increase nutritional value. Genome editing encompasses a wide variety of tools using either a site-specific recombinase (SSR) or a site-specific nuclease (SSN) system. Both systems require recognition of a known sequence. The SSN system generates single or double strand DNA breaks and activates endogenous DNA repair pathways. SSR technology, such as Cre/loxP and Flp/FRT mediated systems, are able to knockdown or knock-in genes in the genome of eukaryotes, depending on the orientation of the specific sites (loxP, FLP, etc.) flanking the target site. There are 4 main classes of SSN developed to cleave genomic sequences, mega-nucleases (homing endonuclease), zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcriptional activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and the CRISPR/Cas nuclease system (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat/CRISPR-associated protein). The recombinase mediated genome engineering depends on recombinase (sub-) family and target-site and induces high frequencies of homologous recombination. Improving crops with gene editing provides a range of options: by altering only a few nucleotides from billions found in the genomes of living cells, altering the full allele or by inserting a new gene in a targeted region of the genome. Due to its precision, gene editing is more precise than either conventional crop breeding methods or standard genetic engineering methods. Thus this technology is a very powerful tool that can be used toward securing the world's food supply. In addition to improving the nutritional value of crops, it is the most effective way to produce crops that can resist pests and thrive in tough climates. There are 3 types of modifications produced by genome editing; Type I includes altering a few nucleotides, Type II involves replacing an allele with a pre-existing one and Type III allows for the insertion of new gene(s) in predetermined regions in the genome. Because most genome-editing techniques can leave behind traces of DNA alterations evident in a small number of nucleotides, crops created through gene editing could avoid the stringent regulation procedures commonly associated with GM crop development. For this reason many scientists believe plants improved with the more precise gene editing techniques will be more acceptable to the public than transgenic plants. With genome editing comes the promise of new crops being developed more rapidly with a very low risk of off-target effects. It can be performed in any laboratory with any crop, even those that have complex genomes and are not easily bred using conventional methods.

Keywords: CRISPR/Cas; MegaN; SSN; SSR; ZFN and TALEN.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Gene swap strategy using Tag and Exchange strategy based on homologous recombination followed by site-specific recombination step.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The structure of SSRs platforms.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Repair mechanisms of double stranded breaks induced by genome editing through non-homologous end joining (left) and homologous recombination (left).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Targeted genome regulation mediated by defected SSN-based factors. The dSSN fusion to (a) activator potentially enhance gene expression by recruitment of transcription factors and RNA polymerase II, (b) potent repressors domains could either prevent the RNA polymerase from binding to the promoter region of specific gene or (c) methylases/demethylases or chromatin modifiers could regulate the transcription of the targeted gene.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Developing of edited plants using SSN genome insertion followed by selection for non transgenic T1 segregant lines.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Albert NW, Davies KM, Lewis DH, Zhang H, Montefiori M, Brendolise C, Boase MR, Ngo H, Jameson PE, Schwinn KE. A conserved network of transcriptional activators and repressors regulates anthocyanin pigmentation in eudicots. Plant cell 2014; 26:962-80; PMID:24642943; http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.113.122069 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ali Z, Abul-Faraj A, Piatek M, Mahfouz MM. Activity and specificity of TRV-mediated gene editing in plants. Plant Signal Behav. 2015; 10(10):e1044191; PMID:26039254; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2015.1044191 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allan AC, Hellens RP, Laing WA. MYB transcription factors that colour our fruit. Trends Plant Sci 2008; 13:99-102; PMID:18280199; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2007.11.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allen BG, Weeks DL. Transgenic Xenopus laevis embryos can be generated using phiC31 integrase. Nat Methods 2005; 2:975-9; PMID:16299484; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth814 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allen BG, Weeks DL. Bacteriophage phiC31 integrase mediated transgenesis in Xenopus laevis for protein expression at endogenous levels. Methods Mol Biol 2009; 518:113-22; PMID:19085128; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-202-1_9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms