Delta, theta, beta, and gamma brain oscillations index levels of auditory sentence processing
- PMID: 26931813
- DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.064
Delta, theta, beta, and gamma brain oscillations index levels of auditory sentence processing
Abstract
A growing number of studies indicate that multiple ranges of brain oscillations, especially the delta (δ, <4Hz), theta (θ, 4-8Hz), beta (β, 13-30Hz), and gamma (γ, 30-50Hz) bands, are engaged in speech and language processing. It is not clear, however, how these oscillations relate to functional processing at different linguistic hierarchical levels. Using scalp electroencephalography (EEG), the current study tested the hypothesis that phonological and the higher-level linguistic (semantic/syntactic) organizations during auditory sentence processing are indexed by distinct EEG signatures derived from the δ, θ, β, and γ oscillations. We analyzed specific EEG signatures while subjects listened to Mandarin speech stimuli in three different conditions in order to dissociate phonological and semantic/syntactic processing: (1) sentences comprising valid disyllabic words assembled in a valid syntactic structure (real-word condition); (2) utterances with morphologically valid syllables, but not constituting valid disyllabic words (pseudo-word condition); and (3) backward versions of the real-word and pseudo-word conditions. We tested four signatures: band power, EEG-acoustic entrainment (EAE), cross-frequency coupling (CFC), and inter-electrode renormalized partial directed coherence (rPDC). The results show significant effects of band power and EAE of δ and θ oscillations for phonological, rather than semantic/syntactic processing, indicating the importance of tracking δ- and θ-rate phonetic patterns during phonological analysis. We also found significant β-related effects, suggesting tracking of EEG to the acoustic stimulus (high-β EAE), memory processing (θ-low-β CFC), and auditory-motor interactions (20-Hz rPDC) during phonological analysis. For semantic/syntactic processing, we obtained a significant effect of γ power, suggesting lexical memory retrieval or processing grammatical word categories. Based on these findings, we confirm that scalp EEG signatures relevant to δ, θ, β, and γ oscillations can index phonological and semantic/syntactic organizations separately in auditory sentence processing, compatible with the view that phonological and higher-level linguistic processing engage distinct neural networks.
Keywords: Auditory sentence; Brain oscillations; EEG; Phonological processing; Semantic processing; Syntactic processing.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Distinct roles of delta- and theta-band neural tracking for sharpening and predictive coding of multi-level speech features during spoken language processing.Hum Brain Mapp. 2023 Dec 1;44(17):6149-6172. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26503. Epub 2023 Oct 11. Hum Brain Mapp. 2023. PMID: 37818940 Free PMC article.
-
Frequency-based Segregation of Syntactic and Semantic Unification during Online Sentence Level Language Comprehension.J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Nov;27(11):2095-107. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00829. Epub 2015 Jun 4. J Cogn Neurosci. 2015. PMID: 26042498
-
Electroencephalographic characteristics of word finding during phonological and semantic verbal fluency tasks.Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2020 Sep;40(3):254-261. doi: 10.1002/npr2.12129. Epub 2020 Aug 5. Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2020. PMID: 32757253 Free PMC article.
-
Brain oscillations as biomarkers in neuropsychiatric disorders: following an interactive panel discussion and synopsis.Suppl Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;62:343-63. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-7020-5307-8.00016-8. Suppl Clin Neurophysiol. 2013. PMID: 24053048 Review.
-
Prominence of delta oscillatory rhythms in the motor cortex and their relevance for auditory and speech perception.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Dec;107:136-142. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.09.012. Epub 2019 Sep 10. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019. PMID: 31518638 Review.
Cited by
-
Lower Beta: A Central Coordinator of Temporal Prediction in Multimodal Speech.Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Oct 24;12:434. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00434. eCollection 2018. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 30405383 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Poor Synchronization to Musical Beat Generalizes to Speech.Brain Sci. 2019 Jul 4;9(7):157. doi: 10.3390/brainsci9070157. Brain Sci. 2019. PMID: 31277417 Free PMC article.
-
Cortical encoding of acoustic and linguistic rhythms in spoken narratives.Elife. 2020 Dec 21;9:e60433. doi: 10.7554/eLife.60433. Elife. 2020. PMID: 33345775 Free PMC article.
-
Concurrent processing of the prosodic hierarchy is supported by cortical entrainment and phase-amplitude coupling.Cereb Cortex. 2024 Dec 3;34(12):bhae479. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhae479. Cereb Cortex. 2024. PMID: 39704246 Free PMC article.
-
Robust EEG-Based Decoding of Auditory Attention With High-RMS-Level Speech Segments in Noisy Conditions.Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Oct 7;14:557534. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.557534. eCollection 2020. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 33132874 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources