Validation of the Italian version of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale in nurses
- PMID: 26935013
- DOI: 10.1111/jonm.12362
Validation of the Italian version of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale in nurses
Abstract
Aims: To ascertain the validity and reliability of the Italian version of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale (SPS-6).
Background: Presenteeism has been associated with a work productivity reduction, a lower quality of work and an increased risk of developing health disorders. It is particularly high among nurses and needs valid tools to be assessed.
Methods: A validation study was carried out from July to September 2014. A three-section tool, made of a demographic form, the Stanford Presenteeism Scale (SPS-6) and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) was administered to a sample of nurses, enrolled in three Italian hospitals.
Results: Cronbach's α for the entire sample (229 nurses) was found to be 0.72. A significant negative correlation between SPS and perceived stress scores evidenced the external validity. The factor analysis showed a two-component solution, accounting for 71.2% of the variance. The confirmatory factor analysis showed an adequate fit.
Conclusion: The Italian SPS-6 is a valid and reliable tool for workplace surveys.
Implications for nursing management: Since the validity and reliability of SPS-6 has been confirmed for the Italian version, we have now a valid tool that can measure the levels of presenteeism among Italian nurses.
Keywords: health; nurse; presenteeism; reliability; validity.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Presenteeism and work ability: development of the Persian version of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale (P-SPS-6) and measurement of its psychometric properties.BMC Psychol. 2021 Aug 17;9(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00617-3. BMC Psychol. 2021. PMID: 34404485 Free PMC article.
-
Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale in a nurse population.Res Nurs Health. 2024 Feb;47(1):17-26. doi: 10.1002/nur.22351. Epub 2023 Nov 19. Res Nurs Health. 2024. PMID: 37982320
-
Validation of the Portuguese version of the Stanford presenteeism scale in nurses.Int J Nurs Pract. 2013 Dec;19(6):644-50. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12117. Epub 2013 Jun 14. Int J Nurs Pract. 2013. PMID: 24330216
-
Nursing Staff Presenteeism Scale: Development and psychometric test.PLoS One. 2024 Apr 16;19(4):e0301787. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301787. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38626084 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring presenteeism: which questionnaire to use in physical activity research?J Phys Act Health. 2014 Feb;11(2):241-8. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2011-0307. Epub 2013 Jan 30. J Phys Act Health. 2014. PMID: 23364284 Review.
Cited by
-
Presenteeism and work ability: development of the Persian version of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale (P-SPS-6) and measurement of its psychometric properties.BMC Psychol. 2021 Aug 17;9(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00617-3. BMC Psychol. 2021. PMID: 34404485 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of occupational coping self-efficacy on presenteeism among ICU nurses in Chinese public hospitals: a cross-sectional study.Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 31;15:1347249. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1347249. eCollection 2024. Front Psychol. 2024. PMID: 38356774 Free PMC article.
-
[Make nursing practice visible through nursing science in times of COVID-19].Wien Med Wochenschr. 2021 Oct;171(13-14):340-347. doi: 10.1007/s10354-021-00858-2. Epub 2021 Jul 1. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2021. PMID: 34196875 Free PMC article. Review. German.
-
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the sickness presenteeism scale- nurse (C-SPS-N): a cross-sectional study.BMC Nurs. 2025 May 7;24(1):494. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03113-w. BMC Nurs. 2025. PMID: 40336046 Free PMC article.
-
Presenteeism among health care workers: literature review.Rev Bras Med Trab. 2020 Aug 4;18(1):97-102. doi: 10.5327/Z1679443520200478. eCollection 2020. Rev Bras Med Trab. 2020. PMID: 32783010 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources