Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Mar;9(3):235-44.
doi: 10.1242/dmm.023762.

Drosophila tools and assays for the study of human diseases

Affiliations
Review

Drosophila tools and assays for the study of human diseases

Berrak Ugur et al. Dis Model Mech. 2016 Mar.

Abstract

Many of the internal organ systems of Drosophila melanogaster are functionally analogous to those in vertebrates, including humans. Although humans and flies differ greatly in terms of their gross morphological and cellular features, many of the molecular mechanisms that govern development and drive cellular and physiological processes are conserved between both organisms. The morphological differences are deceiving and have led researchers to undervalue the study of invertebrate organs in unraveling pathogenic mechanisms of diseases. In this review and accompanying poster, we highlight the physiological and molecular parallels between fly and human organs that validate the use of Drosophila to study the molecular pathogenesis underlying human diseases. We discuss assays that have been developed in flies to study the function of specific genes in the central nervous system, heart, liver and kidney, and provide examples of the use of these assays to address questions related to human diseases. These assays provide us with simple yet powerful tools to study the pathogenic mechanisms associated with human disease-causing genes.

Keywords: Drosophila; Fat body; Heart; Human disease models; Kidney; Liver; Malpighian tubules; Nephrocytes; Nervous system; Neurodegeneration; Oenocyte; Regeneration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing or financial interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aberle H., Haghighi A. P., Fetter R. D., McCabe B. D., Magalhães T. R. and Goodman C. S. (2002). wishful thinking encodes a BMP type II receptor that regulates synaptic growth in Drosophila. Neuron 33, 545-558. 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00589-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allan A. K., Du J., Davies S. A. and Dow J. A. T. (2005). Genome-wide survey of V-ATPase genes in Drosophila reveals a conserved renal phenotype for lethal alleles. Physiol. Genomics 22, 128-138. 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00233.2004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andlauer T. F. M. and Sigrist S. J. (2012). In vivo imaging of Drosophila larval neuromuscular junctions to study synapse assembly. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2012, 407-413. 10.1101/pdb.top068577 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Apidianakis Y. and Rahme L. G. (2011). Drosophila melanogaster as a model for human intestinal infection and pathology. Dis. Model. Mech. 4, 21-30. 10.1242/dmm.003970 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baker K. D. and Thummel C. S. (2007). Diabetic larvae and obese flies-emerging studies of metabolism in Drosophila. Cell Metab. 6, 257-266. 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.09.002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types