Occlusal stability after Herbst treatment of patients with retrognathic and prognathic facial types : A pilot study
- PMID: 26935963
- DOI: 10.1007/s00056-016-0020-x
Occlusal stability after Herbst treatment of patients with retrognathic and prognathic facial types : A pilot study
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess and compare occlusal changes induced by Herbst treatment and the stability of these changes in patients with retrognathic and prognathic facial types.
Patients and methods: The sample comprised 11 retrognathic (SNA ≤76°, SNB ≤72°, ML/NSL ≥36°) and 10 prognathic (SNA ≥83°, SNB ≥80°, ML/NSL ≤32°) patients with Class II molar relationships of ≥0.5 cusp widths bilaterally or ≥1.0 cusp width unilaterally. Both groups involved similar distributions of skeletal maturity before treatment. Study parameters were assessed on casts reflecting the situations before treatment (T0), after Herbst treatment (T1), after multibracket treatment immediately following Herbst treatment (T2), and after a mean of 31.1 months of retention (T3).
Results: Sagittal molar relationships improved by 0.8 cusp widths in the retrognathic and by 0.7 cusp widths in the prognathic group during active treatment (T0-T2). Insignificant changes of ≤0,2 cusp widths were seen in both groups during retention (T2-T3). Overjet decreased by 8.6 mm in the retrognathic and by 5.5 mm in the prognathic group during T0-T2, and both groups showed clinically irrelevant amounts of relapse by 0.7 mm during T2-T3. Overbite improved by 1.2 mm in the retrognathic and by 2.5 mm in the prognathic group during T0-T2, reaching mean values of 1.0 mm or 1.4 mm by T2, which was followed by 0.2 mm or 1.1 mm of relapse during T2-T3.
Conclusion: Treatment with a Herbst appliance seems to offer stable correction of the sagittal occlusal relationships in Class II patients with retrognathic or prognathic facial types, with the vertical changes being more pronounced in the prognathic cases.
Keywords: Facial type; Herbst appliance; Prognathic; Retrognathic; Stability.
Similar articles
-
Herbst treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions in retrognathic and prognathic facial types.Angle Orthod. 2006 Nov;76(6):930-41. doi: 10.2319/100605-352. Angle Orthod. 2006. PMID: 17090166
-
Post-treatment occlusal changes in Class II division 2 subjects treated with the Herbst appliance.Eur J Orthod. 2008 Dec;30(6):606-13. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn062. Eur J Orthod. 2008. PMID: 19054814
-
Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions in early and late adulthood. a prospective cephalometric study of consecutively treated subjects.Eur J Orthod. 2006 Aug;28(4):352-60. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cji116. Epub 2006 Apr 27. Eur J Orthod. 2006. PMID: 16644850
-
Dentoskeletal changes in adult Class II division 1 Herbst treatment--how much is left after the retention period?Eur J Orthod. 2012 Dec;34(6):747-53. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr087. Epub 2011 Jul 22. Eur J Orthod. 2012. PMID: 21785003
-
Immediate skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of the crown- or banded type Herbst appliance on Class II division 1 malocclusion.Angle Orthod. 2008 Mar;78(2):361-9. doi: 10.2319/031107-123.1. Angle Orthod. 2008. PMID: 18251608 Review.
References
-
- Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Sep;126(3):310-7 - PubMed
-
- Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Sep;100(3):220-33 - PubMed
-
- Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Sep;140(3):346-55 - PubMed
-
- Eur J Orthod. 1990 May;12(2):209-18 - PubMed
-
- Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Aug;126(2):153-61; quiz 254-5 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials