Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2016 May;77(3):160-7.
doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0020-x. Epub 2016 Mar 2.

Occlusal stability after Herbst treatment of patients with retrognathic and prognathic facial types : A pilot study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Occlusal stability after Herbst treatment of patients with retrognathic and prognathic facial types : A pilot study

Niko C Bock et al. J Orofac Orthop. 2016 May.

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess and compare occlusal changes induced by Herbst treatment and the stability of these changes in patients with retrognathic and prognathic facial types.

Patients and methods: The sample comprised 11 retrognathic (SNA ≤76°, SNB ≤72°, ML/NSL ≥36°) and 10 prognathic (SNA ≥83°, SNB ≥80°, ML/NSL ≤32°) patients with Class II molar relationships of ≥0.5 cusp widths bilaterally or ≥1.0 cusp width unilaterally. Both groups involved similar distributions of skeletal maturity before treatment. Study parameters were assessed on casts reflecting the situations before treatment (T0), after Herbst treatment (T1), after multibracket treatment immediately following Herbst treatment (T2), and after a mean of 31.1 months of retention (T3).

Results: Sagittal molar relationships improved by 0.8 cusp widths in the retrognathic and by 0.7 cusp widths in the prognathic group during active treatment (T0-T2). Insignificant changes of ≤0,2 cusp widths were seen in both groups during retention (T2-T3). Overjet decreased by 8.6 mm in the retrognathic and by 5.5 mm in the prognathic group during T0-T2, and both groups showed clinically irrelevant amounts of relapse by 0.7 mm during T2-T3. Overbite improved by 1.2 mm in the retrognathic and by 2.5 mm in the prognathic group during T0-T2, reaching mean values of 1.0 mm or 1.4 mm by T2, which was followed by 0.2 mm or 1.1 mm of relapse during T2-T3.

Conclusion: Treatment with a Herbst appliance seems to offer stable correction of the sagittal occlusal relationships in Class II patients with retrognathic or prognathic facial types, with the vertical changes being more pronounced in the prognathic cases.

Keywords: Facial type; Herbst appliance; Prognathic; Retrognathic; Stability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Sep;126(3):310-7 - PubMed
    1. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Sep;100(3):220-33 - PubMed
    1. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Sep;140(3):346-55 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Orthod. 1990 May;12(2):209-18 - PubMed
    1. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Aug;126(2):153-61; quiz 254-5 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources