Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug;55(8):977-90.
doi: 10.1007/s40262-016-0371-x.

Quantitative Prediction of Drug Interactions Caused by CYP1A2 Inhibitors and Inducers

Affiliations

Quantitative Prediction of Drug Interactions Caused by CYP1A2 Inhibitors and Inducers

Laurence Gabriel et al. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

Background: A simple method to predict drug-drug interactions mediated by cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYPs) on the basis of in vivo data has been previously applied for several CYP isoforms but not for CYP1A2. The objective of this study was to extend this method to drug interactions caused by CYP1A2 inhibitors and inducers.

Methods: First, initial estimates of the model parameters were obtained using data from the literature. Then, an external validation of these initial estimates was performed by comparing model-based predicted area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) ratios with observations not used in the initial estimation. Third, refined estimates of the model parameters were obtained by Bayesian orthogonal regression using Winbugs software, and predicted AUC ratios were compared with all available observations. Finally, predicted AUC ratios for all possible substrates-inhibitors and substrates-inducers were computed.

Results: A total of 100 AUC ratios were retrieved from the literature. Model parameters were estimated for 19 CYP1A2 substrate drugs, 26 inhibitors and seven inducers, including tobacco smoking. In the external validation, the mean prediction error of the AUC ratios was -0.22, while the mean absolute error was 0.97 (37 %). After the Bayesian estimation step, the mean prediction error was 0.11, while the mean absolute error was 0.43 (22 %). The AUC ratios for 625 possible interactions were computed.

Conclusion: This analysis provides insights into the interaction profiles of drugs poorly studied so far and can help to identify and manage significant interactions in clinical practice. Those results are now available to the community via a web tool ( http://www.ddi-predictor.org ).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1982 May;31(5):656-61 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1996;51(1):73-8 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1999 Jul;55(5):375-82 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Apr;51(4):586-93 - PubMed
    1. Ther Drug Monit. 1999 Apr;21(2):191-9 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources