Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb;95(8):e2890.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002890.

Risk Factors of Anastomotic Leakage and Long-Term Survival After Colorectal Surgery

Affiliations

Risk Factors of Anastomotic Leakage and Long-Term Survival After Colorectal Surgery

Jong Seob Park et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most serious complications of colorectal surgery. It can affect long-term oncologic outcomes, but the impact on long-term survival remains uncertain. The aim of this study is to evaluate the operative characteristics of leakage and no leakage groups and to analyze long-term oncologic outcomes.We prospectively enrolled 10,477 patients from 2000 to 2011 and retrospectively reviewed the data.Male sex (odds ratio [OR], 3.90; P < 0.001), intraoperative transfusion (OR, 2.31; P = 0.042), and operative time (OR, 1.73; P = 0.032) were independent risk factors of AL in the colon. In the rectum, male sex (OR, 2.37; P < 0.001), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (OR, 2.26; P < 0.001), and regional lymph node metastasis (OR, 1.43; P = 0.012) were independent risk factors of AL, and diverting stoma (OR, 0.24; P < 0.001) was associated with a deceased risk of AL. AL in the rectum without a diverting stoma was associated with disease-free survival (DFS, OR, 1.47; P = 0.037). Colonic leakage was not associated with 5-year DFS (leakage group vs nonleakage group, 72.4% vs 80.9%, P = 0.084); however, in patients undergoing rectal resection, there was a significant difference in 5-year DFS (67.0% vs 76.6%, P = 0.005, respectively).AL in the rectum is associated with worse long-term DFS and overall survival. A diverting stoma was shown to protect against this effect and was associated with long-term survival in rectal surgery. Therefore, creating a diverting stoma should be considered in high-risk patients undergoing rectal surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Comparison of disease-free survival and overall survival in leakage and no leakage groups.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Leakage rate and odds ratio according to number of risk factors in colon and rectum.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Disease-free survival and overall survival according to number of risk factors in colon and rectum.

References

    1. Mrak K, Eberl T, Laske A, et al. Impact of postoperative complications on long-term survival after resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56:20–28. - PubMed
    1. Veyrie N, Ata T, Muscari F, et al. Anastomotic leakage after elective right versus left colectomy for cancer: prevalence and independent risk factors. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 205:785–793. - PubMed
    1. Marra F, Steffen T, Kalak N, et al. Anastomotic leakage as a risk factor for the long-term outcome after curative resection of colon cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009; 35:1060–1064. - PubMed
    1. Frasson M, Flor-Lorente B, Rodriguez JL, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leak after colon resection for cancer: multivariate analysis and nomogram from a multicentric, prospective, national study with 3193 patients. Ann Surg 2015; 262:321–330. - PubMed
    1. Leichtle SW, Mouawad NJ, Welch KB, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55:569–575. - PubMed

Publication types