Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May;30(5):718-25.
doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.23. Epub 2016 Mar 4.

Effect of intravitreal dexamethasone implant on retinal and choroidal thickness in refractory diabetic macular oedema after multiple anti-VEGF injections

Affiliations

Effect of intravitreal dexamethasone implant on retinal and choroidal thickness in refractory diabetic macular oedema after multiple anti-VEGF injections

M Kim et al. Eye (Lond). 2016 May.

Abstract

AimsTo investigate the effect of intravitreal dexamethasone implant (IVD) on central foveal thickness (CFT), choroidal thickness (CT) and its correlation with visual acuity in eyes with refractory diabetic macular oedema (DMO).MethodsThis was a retrospective interventional case-series. Thirty-five eyes of 35 patients were treated with a single injection of IVD because of refractory DMO with CFT over 300 μm, and persistent intraretinal and subretinal fluid despite of multiple intravitreal bevacizumab injections. Patients were followed-up for 6 months for the evaluation of CFT and subfoveal CT by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.ResultsAll eyes (mean age: 59.4±12.35 years; 18 males, 17 females) had been previously treated with multiple bevacizumab injections and showed persistent DMO (mean number of injections 4.08±2.98) The preoperative logMAR BCVA was 0.49±0.24, which gradually improved to 0.46±0.32 at 6 months (P=0.652) and 26% gained two or more lines of Snellen visual acuity. At baseline, the mean CFT was 526.29±123.48 μm, which significantly improved to 316.15±100.09 μm at 3 months (P<0.001). However, CFT deteriorated to 457.07±136.53 μm at 6 months (P=0.051). Similarly, the mean preoperative subfoveal CT was 288.91±36.47 μm and it decreased to 266.85±30.93 μm at 3 months (P<0.01), but increased to 278.63±32.55 μm at 6 months (P=0.137). The reduction of CFT from baseline showed significant correlation with that of subfoveal CT at 3 months (P=0.041) and at 6 months (P=0.008).ConclusionsIn DMO refractory to multiple bevacizumab injections, IVD significantly reduced CFT and subfoveal CT, with BCVA improvement in one-fourth of the patients. The reduction of CFT showed significant correlation with reduction of subfoveal CT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
EDI-OCT images of a patient with refractory DMO treated with IVD implant. CFT and subfoveal CT at (a) baseline, (b) 1 month, (c) 3 months, and (d) 6 months after IVD treatment. CFT was measured on the 1 mm Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) circle centered on the fovea, with the mapping protocol of the OCT software. Subfoveal CT (double-headed arrow) was measured from the hyper-reflective line of the Bruch's membrane to the chorioscleral interface (arrowheads).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Chronological changes of (a) CFT, (b) mean subfoveal CT, and (c) mean BCVA in logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR), in refractory DMO eyes during 6 months follow-up. There was a significant reduction of subfoveal CT at 1 and 3 months, but not at 6 months. The mean CFT significantly decreased at 1 month, and significant improvement in CFT was maintained until 3 months, but the mean CFT increased after 6 months of follow-up. Although BCVA tended to improve gradually until 3 months and decreased after 6 months, the changes in BCVA from baseline were not statistically significant. *Statistically significant difference (P<0.05).
Figure 3
Figure 3
The reduction (%) of CFT from baseline showed significant correlation with that of subfoveal CT at 3 months (P=0.041) and at 6 months (P=0.008), whereas the correlation was not statistically significant at 1 month (P=0.053).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Antonetti DA, Klein R, Gardner TW. Diabetic retinopathy. N Engl J Med 2012; 366(13): 1227–1239. - PubMed
    1. Adamis AP, Miller JW, Bernal MT, D'Amico DJ, Folkman J, Yeo TK et al. Increased vascular endothelial growth factor levels in the vitreous of eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 1994; 118(4): 445–450. - PubMed
    1. Arimura N, Otsuka H, Yamakiri K, Sonoda Y, Nakao S, Noda Y et al. Vitreous mediators after intravitreal bevacizumab or triamcinolone acetonide in eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 2009; 116(5): 921–926. - PubMed
    1. Funatsu H, Noma H, Mimura T, Eguchi S. Vitreous inflammatory factors and macular oedema. Br J Ophthalmol 2012; 96(2): 302–304. - PubMed
    1. Funatsu H, Noma H, Mimura T, Eguchi S, Hori S. Association of vitreous inflammatory factors with diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology 2009; 116(1): 73–79. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms