Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May 1;142(5):489-95.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.3930.

A 20-Year Review of 75 Cases of Salivary Duct Carcinoma

Affiliations

A 20-Year Review of 75 Cases of Salivary Duct Carcinoma

Mark R Gilbert et al. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. .

Abstract

Importance: Salivary duct carcinoma is a rare, aggressive malignancy of the salivary glands. Owing to its rare nature, clinical data are limited, and only a few clinical studies comprise more than 50 patients.

Objective: To review the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center's experience with salivary duct carcinoma over a 20-year period, focusing on demographics, presentation, treatment, and outcome.

Design, setting, and participants: This investigation was a retrospective cohort study in a multihospital institution with tertiary referral. A pathology database was reviewed for all cases of histopathologically diagnosed salivary duct carcinoma from January 1, 1995, to October 20, 2014. Patients who were referrals for pathology review only and were never seen at the institution were excluded. In total, 75 study patients were identified. The electronic medical record was reviewed for details regarding demographics, presentation, treatment, and outcome, including overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). This study was supplemented with a review of the institution's Head and Neck Oncology Database for further clinical details.

Main outcomes and measures: Primary outcome measures consisted of OS and DFS.

Results: The study sample comprised 75 participants with a mean age at diagnosis of 66.0 years (age range, 33-93 years), and 29% (n = 22) were female. Most primary tumors were from the parotid gland (83%), with the next most frequent site being the submandibular gland (12%). Overall, 41% of the cases were carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma. Rates of other histologic features included the following: perineural invasion (69%), extracapsular spread (58%), ERBB2 (formerly HER2) positivity (31%) (62% of those who were tested), and vascular invasion (61%). The median OS was 3.1 years, and the median DFS was 2.7 years. Univariate Kaplan-Meier survival analyses demonstrated that facial nerve sacrifice and extracapsular spread were associated with lower OS (2.38 vs 5.11 years and 2.29 vs 6.56 years, respectively) and DFS (2.4 vs 3.88 years and 1.44 vs 4.5 years, respectively). Although underpowered, multivariable analysis demonstrated significantly worse OS in patients with N2 and N3 disease (hazard ratio [HR] 8.42, 95% CI, 1.84-38.5) but did not show significantly worse DFS or OS for facial nerve sacrifice or extracapsular spread. There was no association between ERBB2 positivity and survival and no difference in survival between patients receiving radiation therapy vs radiation therapy plus chemotherapy. No patients had recurrence or distant metastasis after 5 disease-free years.

Conclusions and relevance: Salivary duct carcinoma is an aggressive disease. A large number of cases in this review were carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma and had classic negative prognostic indicators, such as perineural invasion, vascular invasion, and extracapsular spread. ERBB2 positivity was not associated with any difference in survival. Facial nerve involvement appears to indicate worse prognosis, as does nodal stage higher than N1. Recurrence and metastasis after 5 years are rare.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure
Figure
Overall and Disease-Free Survival The number at risk at the time of median survival is 25 for overall survival and 19 for disease-free survival.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Salovaara E, Hakala O, Bäck L, et al. Management and outcome of salivary duct carcinoma in major salivary glands. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;270(1):281–285. - PubMed
    1. Luukkaa H, Klemi P, Leivo I, et al. Salivary gland cancer in Finland 1991–96: an evaluation of 237 cases. Acta Otolaryngol. 2005;125(2):207–214. - PubMed
    1. Jayaprakash V, Merzianu M, Warren GW, et al. Survival rates and prognostic factors for infiltrating salivary duct carcinoma: analysis of 228 cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Head Neck. 2014;36(5):694–701. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kleinsasser O, Klein HJ, Hübner G. Salivary duct carcinoma: a group of salivary gland tumors analogous to mammary duct carcinoma [in German] Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd. 1968;192(1):100–105. - PubMed
    1. Jaehne M, Roeser K, Jaekel T, Schepers JD, Albert N, Löning T. Clinical and immunohistologic typing of salivary duct carcinoma: a report of 50 cases. Cancer. 2005;103(12):2526–2533. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms